English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Looks like Iran may have a nuke by March or April...

Ahmedinijad has stated that Israel should be wiped off the map; that he longs for the apocalypse, etc...

Why shouldn't Israel just solve this problem now?

2007-01-02 02:48:52 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

20 answers

Iran is a terrorist state that has proclaimed that it wishes to destroy Israel. Nuclear weapons would give them the opportunity to do so, heaven forfend.

If Israel does indeed have a nuclear capability, it will use it only as a last resort, after a first strike by some other power.

Iran is the biggest threat to the West today, and their military capability must be curbed by the West.

In addition, individual terrorists must be eliminated--if necessary by engaging them and killing them.

There can be no rational argument against this two-pronged approach.

2007-01-02 17:06:15 · answer #1 · answered by Ivri_Anokhi 6 · 0 3

The worst factor that would desire to take place could be for Israel to strike against Iran. the full center East could explode into conflict. you're able to additionally no longer below estimate Irans ability to strike back. they're, as a militia rigidity ok equipped , no longer in uncomplicated terms with a militia yet an dazzling Air rigidity, and an invaluable military. they're extremely able to launching an extremely good missile attack against Israel via floor and air.

2016-10-06 08:08:49 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

No. There is still time yet for other solutions. If Iran had any desire to seek peaceful resolutions, that is.

But once Iran conducts a test, proving they have the capability, then Israel will have no choice but to honor the threat and take irrevocable and irreversible action. By calling for the elimination of Israel, Iran is forcing them to act.

Let nobody doubt that the fault will lie on Iran's head.

2007-01-02 03:00:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

The only reason hey do is to balance out the nuclear power in the Mideast. Its long known Israel hates its neighbors. And they have nukes, though they wont admit to it. If you want to remove Iran as a threat then remove Israels Nuclear arsenal

2007-01-02 03:01:25 · answer #4 · answered by Mr. I Don't Care 1 · 3 1

WHAT!!! Israel must mirror themself before launch a pre-emptive strike because they themself have the nuclear weapons and nobody say a word about this not even U.S...so better shut-up

2007-01-02 03:05:46 · answer #5 · answered by maleozi 1 · 1 0

hmm, not easy to attack Iran without getting attacked yourself.
Iran's missiles can reach Israel, and Israel is not so big, Iran is like 100 times larger.
also there is Hezbollah and Hamas and many other countries\groups which will defend Iran.

I'd say if Israel attacks Iran, then Iran will launch hundreds of missiles to Israel and hit'em back, then the big war comes.

2007-01-02 02:54:51 · answer #6 · answered by Dirty 5 · 4 0

I'm reasonably certain Israel will not allow a nuclear Iran to exist.

2007-01-02 02:59:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6 1

this would be quite illegal.Iran,as a country that signed the NNPT has every right to nuclear technology,as long as it is used in civilian purposes...and until now there is no prove that they don't respect that...And more there is no prove that Iran is building a nuclear weapon and if they are building one,there is no prove that they are going to use it...
And one more thing,I really doubt that Russia will allow Israel or any other country to just blow up its millions dollars that it has put into the Iranian nuclear facility...

2007-01-02 04:00:24 · answer #8 · answered by Tinkerbell05 6 · 2 2

For the past 6-8 months, I've been saying that the US, Israel, Britain, or ALL of the above, will probably hit Iran by this spring . Maybe a little later if there appears to be a 'chance' that somehow Achmadinejad will be overthrown . And maybe a little sooner if he continues his defiance and saber rattling .

2007-01-02 02:57:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

Yes they should but can you imagine the international outcry that would case?
It seems Israel is in a no win situation. Might as well do what protects you, since you're going to be damned anyway.
Of course, Israel striking Iran first would help Ahmedinijad.

2007-01-02 02:54:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4 4

fedest.com, questions and answers