Saddam was the reason of killing many Iraqi people , but now after saddam's hanging alot of Iraqi people thought that thig will be thier first step , so what you think?
2007-01-02 01:05:42 · 13 answers · asked by Sara 3 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
I think more innocent Iraqi people will die in 2007 versus the number of deaths in 2006. The people will with out a doubt be empowered by his death and fight against the people they hold responsible.
2007-01-02 01:18:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Iraq is the focus of a global conflict at this time. The people of Iraq are facing criminals from within the country and terrorists from outside. This is why they need outside help right now.
In spite of negative media reports, I hear enough to know that many Iraqis are working heroically to build an effective democratic government. I have not forgotten the massive participation in the national election, in the face of terrorist threats.
I am much concerned that the world conflict will get larger before it ends. I expect that the Iraqi people will have a crucial part in it.
2007-01-02 04:28:03 · answer #2 · answered by The First Dragon 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
USA will install and arm up the new irqi governemnt.. eventually leave.. and then dominate the flow of iraq oil.. enriching only those iraqis who play ball..
The innocent victims of iraq will remain victims for at least 20 years till iraq is modernized as it will be now and rebuilt.. sadly.. their civilization has been destroyed.. and this act alone should be cursed globally!! Irespective of how many people were killed by ONE man called Saddam Hussein.. surely USA could have found a way ot remove him, without having to bomb the whole nation of Iraq and sitting back while it disintegrates.. sorry.. but in my opinion.. NOTHING justifies what USA has done to Iraq!! The damage USA caused to Iraq is nowhere NEAR the damage done by all terror attacks combined then multiplied by 1000!!! It is simply a very very heavy handed repsonse.. and which has now proven to have been based on totally false information..
Furthermore.. I find it hard that anyone can justify destroying an entire sovereign nation, with all its ancient treasures now stolen and ruined.. to remove one leader.. who didnt even put up any kind of resistance.. yet the bombings continue to this day.. every public building has been destroyed, all utilities destroyed.. and now all iraqis live like thrid class people.. this is totally unnaceptable!!
Now that Saddam is gone.. there is no longer a tyrant to blame.. so now USA MUST fix Iraq and allow its people to live in peace.. at least under Saddam 90% lived in peace.. now.. 5% live in peace.. if that!!
USA is responsible now to ensure Iraqi people can live again in peace.. if it only takes the oil.. and it will be found in years to come.. then USA will rightfully be comdemned globally for having commited one of the greatest acts of miserable war against a foreign nation.. and attempted to disguise it as some kind of fair justice..
time will tell..
2007-01-02 01:30:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
We could no longer bypass to Iraq while 9/11 occurred, as all flight have been grounded except you have been referred to as "Bin encumbered", so there could have been no part of ask your self in arriving in Iraq through bus or catching a journey. It takes lots time to organise a protection stress - I advise, who needs a window seat, who needs the ailse seat? who has particular weight loss application standards? and all that hand luggage to envision in. probably visitors are no longer allowed to take weapons on flights now the two, i think of I examine that during a Chomsky Z-internet article, so whilst quickly as the army have arrived are you able to think of the chaos of each and every solider attempting to locate their weapons as they bypass around the luggage belt. No, it could have been loopy to hurry into Iraq on 9/11. As for Saddam Husein - to no longer be perplexed with the former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein - I disagree, i think of it may be ultimate to dangle him in the previous he's imprisoned. Prisoners in basic terms bleat on approximately human rights regardless of each and everything, so shall we cut back out an appeals technique selection.What did Husein do besides?
2016-11-25 22:14:30 · answer #4 · answered by vescio 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A lot of Iraquis will be relieve that the tyrant is dead... and don't have to fear him anymore.
A lot of other will feel that justice has been serve for the murder of their relatives by Saddam regime.
As for the terrorists... nothing change. They are sponsored by Iran and they will continue to fight.
However... we have all forgotten about something very important...
The reason that the US put Saddam in power was to prevent Iran invading Iraq.
Now that Saddam is gone... if we leave Iraq... the Iranians will walk straight in and invade Iraq.
2007-01-02 01:17:01 · answer #5 · answered by Aussies-Online 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
as brainy up there sez, civil war and chaos
killing saddam was just bush seniors agenda. now there's the problem of having killed all those thousands of iraqi citizens in pursuit of that goal. then there's the whole sunni versus shi'a conflict.
2007-01-02 01:26:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
History will repeat itself. It had happened in Vietnam, Indonesia and other countries. Another Leader will emerge to lead Iraq. In the mean while foreigners who invaded Iraq will exit one by one quoting some reason or other.
2007-01-02 01:32:47 · answer #7 · answered by Brahmanyan 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The late Saddam used to brag that Allah will destroy the Americans through him.
Now the Iraquis have seen how much Allah can help them against Bush. They will be sadder but wiser.
2007-01-02 01:13:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
They'll fight & resist the occupation till they achieve their freedom ; the same way of Saddam .
2007-01-02 01:09:29 · answer #9 · answered by Zaki M 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
They're going to party like there's no tomorrow
2007-01-02 01:45:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋