That Bush has made collosal blunders in the use of American (and "coalition" troops) in the Iraq War is indisputable; Bush is the most inept commander-in-chief in American history (not to mention the worst president in US history). Saddam Hussein's military tactics in the first Gulf War were widely derided as horrendous; Hussein was obviously no master military planner. It stands to reason that Hussein lacked the ability to command or plan for, with any effectiveness, military operations, even in the latest conflict with the US. So how do you think George Bush feels, knowing that a two-bit dictator from a tiny middle eastern nation completely outplanned George Bush with his military strategy? Is Bush embarassed for being so inept? Is Bush angry? Is Bush enraged? Can Bush accept the fact that he has wrecked the US military forces for years to come? Does Bush have intimate relations with either, or both, of his daughters? What do you think?
2007-01-02 00:48:15 · 11 answers · asked by we2inmaine 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Sniper: I never supported Hussein. I am pointing out that Bush is such a failure that Hussein's strategy is still going, due to Bush's complete refusal to act rationally and responsibly at the outset. Any soldier with a brain should realize that Bush is destroying the US. Are you one of those idiot soldiers who thought Kerry was making fun of you when it was obvious he meant to make fun of Bush? And it's 'voila', not 'wha lah'.
Warren: Why do you think it is so sick that I believe Bush might be F'ing his own daughters? I wouldn't put it past him. He is, after all, the guy who is F'ing the entire US: especially the little children and babies who are each saddled with thousands of dollars in future debt.
Aussies: At least you have a well-formed position. However, I believe that Bush failed when he disregarded advice form the generals at the start.
t t: Bush is in fact the highest ranking member of the US Armed Forces. He controls our forces, and decides on strategy. Nice try.
2007-01-02 01:23:49 · update #1
How does George Bush feel knowing that Paris Hilton is a superior military tactician than Bush?
2007-01-02 02:49:26 · answer #1 · answered by protocols 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
First off Bush is not a military leader, he is politician and business man. The commander in chief(the president) tales the advice of countless people, that include his military commanders. The president does not devise military tactics, he simply listens to the advice he receives and makes a decision. Saddam was not a great military leader despite all his money and the money of his allies he was never able to defeat an admirable foe.
Nice try guy.
2007-01-02 01:02:00 · answer #2 · answered by t t 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, which is it? Hussein is or is not superior to Bush when it comes to tactical leadership. Not that you know the difference. From Husseins view, you simply send your thugs to the weak and poor, demolish their villiage, kill their children, women and men. Then sit back and let the fear spread. And , Wha lah, your a fearless leader. I wonder, If you had been laying on the ground, gasping for breathe after Husseins perfectly, run tactical army had just got through gassing your town, would you still want to kiss his,,,,well you get the point.
2007-01-02 01:05:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think Bush is responsible for any of this...
It is the people... the voters... who march in the streets of every Western nation... including America... and demands that we have a war without killing any civilian.
So our soldiers sit in the middle of the street in Iraq and wait for the bad guys to come out of their hiding place. Our soldiers are nothing more than a bait to attract the ennemy.
This is not a war... This is a game of cat and mouse.
1991 was a war... And when we had them on the run... we went home. Don't blame Bush junior. Blame his father. He was the idiot. He had Saddam in the palm of his hand in 1991... and he let him go.
2007-01-02 01:04:09 · answer #4 · answered by Aussies-Online 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If he was so tactically inclined,why then can't they fight us on the open battle field instead of sneaking around like a bunch of cowards?We kicked his butt in the open fair and square.The other guys,army x,uses gorilla tactics.Their nothing but modern day murderers.There is no honor in what they do.Americans try to save civilian lives,army x doesn't care who they kill,because they are out of control.The radical movement has lost all meaning.Things will never change if you keep teaching your kids hatred.It hurts my heart to hear a Muslim child just a couple years old talking about killing and hating.That child never got to be a child.As far as suicide bombers,their not true martyrs.They are going to hell every time they blow themselves up.
2007-01-02 05:54:58 · answer #5 · answered by Derek B 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just an aside albeit a bit drole. The Bush twins are "persona non grata" in Argentina, a country that opened it's doors to Nazi war criminals.
2007-01-02 01:19:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
President has to depend on Intelligence report and opinion of his advisers. He has good intention for a Iraqi people and wanted a democratic rule. He is still on his agenda. USA army is still strong and organized. Main sufferers are people of Iraq. Death toll is 12600 for 2006. One thing we should not forget. If you invade an established country one should be prepared for loss.
2007-01-02 01:27:06 · answer #7 · answered by snashraf 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You enlighten me on how revolting some people's thoughts are. Your comments credit Saddam for Bush's failings. These were all his own. His daughters? I suggest a shrink, not the net; well not this net.
2007-01-02 00:59:49 · answer #8 · answered by Warren S 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Maybe Bullshit got jealous, and therefore caused the death of Saddam Hussein.
2007-01-02 00:54:12 · answer #9 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
about the same way pre-teens feel about you
2007-01-02 03:07:04 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋