(I know it's a title of a song...!)
2007-01-02 00:22:33 · 15 answers · asked by Rick G 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Yes; yes, that's the band name, i mean YES :D 70/80's prog rock. Nice Bowed guitar solo though.
PS Lean how to spell "Owner of a Lonely Heart" recorded by Yes
2007-01-02 00:29:04 · answer #1 · answered by Meteor Crater Boy 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'd rather be an owner of a broken heart than of a lonely heart. I think a broken heart is a sign of a deeper experience, one that is much richer in meaning than a lonely heart. However, I wouldn't just go around forming relationships with people who aren't worthy of a relationship in order to force an experience. The value in a broken heart comes only from what was once a rich and special experience. The broken heart although it is not a happy experience, is still a very valuable experience in itself.
2007-01-02 02:39:11 · answer #2 · answered by oneclassicmaiden 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Good question, I see a twist in this.
Actually it is a broken heart that hurts due to loneliness ..... having had fallen in love and then been rejected, it would lack the enthusiasm to look for an alternate love.
However, the broken heart has had an experience with love, even though unsuccessful... the very experience of feeling love is a unique bliss which can never be imagined without experience.
On the other hand, the heart that has never had the experience of love would crave for that experience, even as it would be busy looking for love.
In matters of heart, it is just not black and white to say this is better than the other situation. Either way, it is always a mixed up feeling.
2007-01-02 01:25:21 · answer #3 · answered by small 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I would rather have a broken heart for a while then a lonely heart forever. Its about taking risks I think and how you have to over come some logical thinking to fall in love and can pay a huge price for it.
2007-01-02 01:12:41 · answer #4 · answered by magpiesmn 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
right, you can keep your deer company and it won't be lonely anymore. Much better than a broken hart across the hood of your car.
2007-01-02 00:31:51 · answer #5 · answered by silentnonrev 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A hart is a deer, so I definitely think owning a broken one wouldn't be much good unless you intended to kill and eat it.
2007-01-02 00:35:17 · answer #6 · answered by redhatgirl 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
lonely heart is ideally better than broken heart but broken heart has learnt a lesson, so it's less likely to be broken again whereas lonely heart can get busted. that's life.
2007-01-02 00:31:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
When it breaks, your heart starts ticking. So the impulse to get at least something out of life is activated, and you get momentum to try something else you were always afraid of or had a hard time keeping dedicated to following through on.
2007-01-02 03:51:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the performer of the song was a groups called yes. That is also the answer to the querstion. Better to never know love, than to know it and lose it. After all you can't miss what you never had.
2007-01-02 00:35:55 · answer #9 · answered by kveldulf_gondlir 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a lonely heart is much better then a broken heart. it hurts too much to have a broken heart.
2007-01-02 00:33:27 · answer #10 · answered by vanessaoz 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋