Ive seen the hanging on the internet of this piece of scum and cant see what the fuss is about as it is very poor quality. whoever filmed it could not keep a steady hand. it is also dark. Its ok for the foreign channels who used to show dead bodies of our troops etc.
the basterd is dead now and got what he deserved so happy new year everyone and toast the fact that he is finally rotting in hell for all his evil crimes.
What do you think ?
2007-01-02 00:17:32 · 28 answers · asked by 90210 aka Hummer Lover 6 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Yeah, I watched it to, I didn't see what the big deal was about. They showed beheadings on mainstream TV. It's just another media machine ploy. They should have covered him in pigs blood and stuck some pig nuts in his mouth before they pulled the lever. Fu*k the sadistic cu*t. Hope he enjoys an eternity of giving bl0w j0bs to Satan, and bumming hitler.
Don't pay no mind to the bleeding heart whiners, they're the first ones to complain about everything, but lack the intestinal fortitude to do anything about it. They're the copitulaters, the ones you can't trust, because they have no loyalty, other than to save their own hide. Scumbags.
Cheers, Happy New Year.
2007-01-02 00:32:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Snapping of the spinal cord. not strangulation. There are 32 vertabrae interior the spinal column and that they are all separate products and are held jointly by using very good cartliage. this is the cord interior the vertabrae that breaks and not the separate bones. Strangulation can purely happen whilst lynch mobs carry close somebody. this is a experienced interest through fact the noose could be located in a particular way on the area of the neck. loss of life is purely approximately on the spot. do not stay in this, all of us be attentive to it form of feels barbaric yet purely think of of the depressing deaths the masses of hundreds suffered at Saddams behest. think of incredibly of Jesus and why we had Christmas
2016-12-11 21:00:54 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know the questioner's religious belief; but, here is mine. The King James version of the Bible says: Judge not lest you be judged. Those appointed as judges perform their duty according to their laws. We don't wear that mantle. My personal belief is that we should leave judging to judges and to God. The video was of poor quality; it was dark; the videographer was (one would think) in some danger and under stress. There was a time when executions were public, partly to deter other crime. I think this should have been public. Since it was not, this clandestine video is all that is now available. Perhaps more will be forthcoming
2007-01-02 00:41:39 · answer #3 · answered by Warren S 1 · 3⤊ 1⤋
The present & 2 previous US presidents killed more people and invaded/terrorized more countries then Saddam Hussein, who also never used depleted uranium (unlike those presidents) and knew how to be generous (unlike Mad Albright) to people who helped him during his childhood. So yes, I know some Iraqis were killed or had parts of their body cut off on his orders. But that doesn't makes him worse then some "friends of the US", such as the rulers of Saudi-Arabia. is the fact that Kurds were opressed under his rule makes him a "bastard"? Where were you when Ocullan (PKK leader) was cuptured by Turkey, which was under the rule of the butcher of Cyprus (and with the help of the US)?
2007-01-02 00:48:06 · answer #4 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Yes fine good point he has paid for his crimes but I think an ounce of dignity would have been nice when he was getting prepped for his death.
I think that the executioners throwing insults at him as he prepares to die is totally wrong.
At least one of the men in there had some decency as he told his fellow countrymen to ''be quiet...this man is about to die''
And to say that is ok to show him dying in lets face it disgraceful circumstances on tv because foriegn channels show our dead or wounded troops is just plain wrong......that is what seperates our country and our values from theirs.
And while we are on the subject are we going to hang G.W. Bush for his crimes against humanity?
I personally think capital punishment is wrong.
2007-01-02 00:39:59 · answer #5 · answered by Neo 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
wow give him dignity? how many rubbish bags of bits of human bodies got dumped? how many children were slaughtered?
take a look at your little ones and think about dignity?
yes at the same time 2 wrongs sure do not make a right, and what has been achieved by doing this anyway? more evil.
people will still be wicked and to the one who said he only killed kurds and jews far as i am concerned there is wickedness in all people no one is better than anyone else in this world, i guess if he had murdered one of your loved words you would change your tune stupid!
2007-01-02 03:17:42 · answer #6 · answered by sugar 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Below is a piece I wrote concerning the death of Saddam. Though I agree with his execution I do not agree with your spirit. It is never OK to hate. Hate only eats one up inside and by doing so we reside in our own personal hell.
Likewise we can create the Kingdom of God on earth by not only shifting our perspective, but by encouraging feelings of love, joy, and peace in our hearts.
With that said here is the piece I wrote below.
“I believe there was reason for the execution of Saddam. I do not believe Saddam was any different from Hitler in moral quality. Between the tortures, rape rooms, and mass killings there was plenty of justification to kill Saddam.
Believe it or not I am not the type of person who believes in revenge but if a person presents great danger to society then by all means this person should be dis-empowered, even to the point of death.
I believe that if Saddam escaped and or was freed somehow he would present a serious danger that would cause many deaths. And yes there was a chance, prisoners escape sometimes with the help of guards all the time. Or a worse scenario, a dramatic shift in the political climatic.
As for reprisal killings. I believe those who are out there killing in mass really don't need any more excuses. They are so filled with hate and indoctrination they have already in their own minds have the excuses to kill Iraqis of other sects as well as any foreigners that reside in their country.
It seems we live in a world of extremes. Those who have blatant disregard for human life, and the bleeding hearts so to speak, who will cry foul at ridding this world of one of the most serious human rights offenders in recent history. What I hope is that we will eventually come to a healthy balance.
One more thing I want to say is that there is a spiritual element to all this. Personally I believe there is a good probability that we live many lives. The lessons we learn in this life can be carried into the next.
Saddam was responsible for some horrible atrocities which these words can never truly describe. With that said I believe Saddam needed this type of Karma to know how it felt to be killed.
In all actuality his was given much more dignity and a less painful death than many of his victims. With this also being said Saddam had the opportunity to empathize with his victims. It is almost impossible to empathize with anyone without some relational experience to go off of. If you never had a cold in your life it would be hard to relate to someone who had a cold and was suffering. Those would have lost a child can offer support on a much deeper level than those who have not, etc.
I am not saving you cannot empathize at all unless you have had the exact same experience but you do need to have had some suffering in your life to connect the dots of what it must feel like for another to suffer.
Sometimes we forget and or simply don't care. In these cases another jolt of intense suffering may wake us up to reality and hopefully we can have a spiritually transformative experience that will ultimately alleviate suffering for ourselves as well as others.”
2007-01-02 00:52:50 · answer #7 · answered by Love of Truth 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
The horrific and brutal murder of Saddam Hussein by a rabble of thieves and corrupt officials is an absolute disgrace. Shame on all of us.
I would like to refer you to a study carried out by the lancet in October 2006, which although quickly denounced as inaccurate by the US administration responsible for the mass genocide was actually conducted according the the US' own concensus policies. This study estimates the total number of deaths in Iraq since the beginning of the illegal occupation to be closer to 655,000. This is significantly higher than the number of deaths Saddam was sentenced to death for. Can we expect blue berets to turn up in Washington and Whitehall to carry out an extraordinary rendition to collect Bush and Blair and lead them to the Gallows ?
2007-01-02 00:41:31 · answer #8 · answered by Peter H 2 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Finally.. the world has been rid of a tyrant responble for the deaths of thousands of innocent civilians..
Now we need to remove the remaining tyrants.. especially George Bush.. who has presided over the deaths of at least 3,000 soldiers, 3,500 deaths on September 11, and some 50,000 civilians now dead since the Iraq war started..
Texas still has the death penalty too.. so if he gets impeached or just thrown out.. we might see the final tyrant fall..
2007-01-02 01:01:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
He wasn't killed because of war crimes. He tortured and killed 148 people. He didn't just kill them, he tortured them...
It is right that he was killed. He didn't want a black mask on him, because I don't think he honestly believed they were going to kill him... I think he thought that someone was going to change their mind. I am glad that he was scared. Killing all those people was wrong.
And no, I don't believe that Bush and Blair should be hung also. It is different. We are in a war. In war, people die... We aren't torturing anyone, therefore, we can't punish Bush and Blair, because they haven't done anything wrong. I am glad that Bush is taking a stand. If he didn't, would anyone else? I don't know about anyone else, but I sure don't want another 9/11 to happen, just because they don't like us. Take care of them, before they take care of us... (Just my 2 cents.... you can take it or leave it...) :)
And MrSuccessfulBachelor, why should Bush be punished for 3500 deaths on 9/11? Do you guys somehow think he is responsible for it?
Happy New Year to all and thanks for reading my comments... :)
**********************************************************************
Hussein was convicted on November 5 of crimes against humanity in connection with the killings of 148 people in the town of Dujail after an attempt on his life.
The dictator was found guilty of murder, torture and forced deportation.
The Dujail episode falls within 12 of the worst cases out of 500 documented "baskets of crimes" during the Hussein regime.
The U.S. State Department says torture and extrajudicial killings followed the Dujail killings and that 550 men, women and children were arrested without warrants.
**********************************************************************
2007-01-02 01:17:20 · answer #10 · answered by TNT 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋