I had felt before USC's loss to UCLA they they were the one team in the country that would give OSU a run for their money...looks like I was right
MICHIGAN SUCKS!!!
2007-01-02 00:17:03 · 14 answers · asked by thuglife 5 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
please tell me that was sarcasm directed to the michigan crybabies who screamed for a rematch during the last 5 weeks.
if it was, i found it very funny!
no, a rematch is not necessary. you get many weeks to prepare and only one chance to prove your team is better than your opponent. if you go down, you go down.
and yes, USC is probably the best team to give ohio state a run for their money!
2007-01-02 05:21:25 · answer #1 · answered by loveholio 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I truly think Michigan is a better team than Florida this year. However, I think Florida is more deserving of a shot at OSU. Florida won their con, Mich didn't. Also, OSU already beat Mich, why would they need to do it again?
The BCS is a terrible system, but since it has to be done this way this year, the right decision was made.
It would still be much better with a playoff system so that these questions wouldn't come up. But...there's no money in that.
2007-01-02 08:34:05 · answer #2 · answered by Anthony M 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
USC fan im guessing, USC lost to UCLA even if that doesnt prove they suck and got lucky against Michigan, it proves that anybody can win on any given day. Theres like 5 or so teams that are the caliber of winning the national championship, who wins between those teams depends on who is having a good day.
2007-01-02 08:39:20 · answer #3 · answered by Adam 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
A USC-Michigan rematch would help USC prove that it deserves to play Ohio State.
2007-01-02 12:04:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO!! are you kidding???? this isnt golf..no mulligans!!!
they had their shot against Oh St and BLEW IT!!! they had theyre shot to beat USC and BLEW IT!!! USCs coached made it seem like they were coaching against a high school team. MI coaches had no idea what to do against USC offensive and defensive schemes. MI had the talent on the field to beat USC but got out coached and got their @$$'s handed to them.
32-18 doesnt do justice to show how much of a blow out it really was!
2007-01-02 11:43:42 · answer #5 · answered by FIGHT ON! 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that USC should play Boise State and Michigan and Florida should play to see who will play OSU.
GO WOLVERINES!!
2007-01-02 14:57:15 · answer #6 · answered by Michigan Wolverines- GO BLUE! 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
And to think, OSU barely beat Michigan. Do you think they may be a little overrated??? Maybe USC should play Florida.
2007-01-02 08:32:57 · answer #7 · answered by willyc 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Michigan got their behind handed to them on a platinum platter and they wouldn't deserve to play against boise state
2007-01-02 09:25:18 · answer #8 · answered by Heatman 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
lol, that's the most ridiculous argument the lame Michigan fans will make. You're right, Michigan sucks.
2007-01-02 08:40:59 · answer #9 · answered by . 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yeah, because, you know. . . If they had played on a neutral field. Michigan needs to suck it up and stop whinning. We all know they can't bring it in the big games. GO BUCKEYES!!!!!!
2007-01-02 09:58:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋