more oil for the illuminati
2007-01-01 23:21:55 · 11 answers · asked by brian e 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
YES - Where are the "Weapons of Mass Destruction???"
And WHY did USA train Osama Bin Laden and
THEN claim he is a terrorist or do you think all the families are in on it and they are ALL after the oil and power.
The Iraqi War shouldn't have started - Wars should be started for the RIGHT reasons and should be sanctioned by United Nations.
Illegal Wars going against world political opinions are a definite sign of pure greed.
Let's face FACTS if Iraq had kissed America's As* it would never have been attacked... HITLER REPEATED ANYONE?
2007-01-01 23:24:34 · answer #1 · answered by valley_storm 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes,i suppose you could call it the war on greed! I believe the president's motives was about oil,haliburton and going after saddam. There seems to have no relation to 9/11. But in saying that our soldiers motives are pure and has given hope to alot of people that some day they might live to see some type f freedom,if only a little!
2007-01-01 23:47:40 · answer #2 · answered by MaryAnn K 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
War on ignorant conspiracy nuts has a better ring I think.
And don't you realize the Illuminati are a puppet organization? The real culprits are the evil Radioactive monkeys. They run everything from The Vatican to wall-mart and even Starbucks and live in the international space station.
Man don't you know anything?
2007-01-01 23:28:19 · answer #3 · answered by Stone K 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
If you still believe (think is too generous a word) it's about oil, you're living a fact-free existance.
The "war for oil" meme has been a pitiful lie for almost 4 years.
2007-01-02 01:48:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
probably.
if you control the land of oil, you control the oil industry itself. so it means that you can start to dictate what price you want it to be when you sell it to other countries.. you control the lives of all the people who depend on oil to make machines work. like some major monopoly.
2007-01-01 23:27:00 · answer #5 · answered by Thrasher_666 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No. The war on terror is just that. Radicals want everyone dead that differs with their beliefs. We fight them there or in your back yard. I choose to fight them there, not here. It only makes sense.
2007-01-01 23:25:23 · answer #6 · answered by capnemo 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
State your case, give us facts please, who is profiting?
If you say Haliburton, which is a publicly traded company, and you are smart enough to have a 401K you may be one of the greedy ones.
2007-01-01 23:25:26 · answer #7 · answered by Albert H 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sure, if it will make you clueless folks happy. Call it what ever you want.
2007-01-01 23:32:04 · answer #8 · answered by netnazivictim 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No. I think the name is fine the way it is.
2007-01-01 23:23:46 · answer #9 · answered by deftonehead778 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's sort of hitting two birds with one shot...
2007-01-01 23:27:44 · answer #10 · answered by roadwarrior 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋