English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-01-01 19:51:36 · 6 answers · asked by pnatt89 1 in Politics & Government Politics

I've always considered support for guns to be conservative and opposition to guns to be liberal. That's how it is in Australia anyway.

2007-01-01 19:55:44 · update #1

6 answers

I wouldn't consider him liberal or Conservative. Alex Jones just believes in freedom. He is pro-gun because he understands the problems of a country where the citizens are stripped of their right to own guns. It is a fact that in the 20th century 56 million people were killed by their own government. The only thing a government that wishes to rule fears is an armed intelligent population.

2007-01-02 04:02:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anthony M 4 · 0 0

Maybe because Alex Jones is one of the few Liberals who actually even still have some sense, the number of Liberals who have any sense at all has dwindled greatly.

hen again Liberal use to have a much different meaning than now, for instance Abraham Lincoln was deemed Liberal in his day but Lincoln and many others deemed Liberal back then fit the modern day description of Conservative.

2007-01-01 19:57:09 · answer #2 · answered by MrCool1978 6 · 1 1

Alex Jones uses some issues that Conservatives can agree with in order to sucker them into others that are very dangerous to our society. A clever deceiver disguises 20% of wickedness with 80% goodness.

I have caught the guy utterly BSing.

Regarding the use of the word 'liberal'. True liberals support gun ownership. It is Leftists who strive to deprive us of our means of enforcing our Sovereignty. Leftists call themselves Liberals (or Progressives) as a disguise. There is a powerful difference between Leftists and Liberals.

2007-01-01 19:56:11 · answer #3 · answered by speakeasy 6 · 0 1

I wouldn't describe Alex Jones as a liberal. . .

2007-01-01 19:55:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Perhaps he's not TOTALLY brainwashed by liberalism, as the need to protect one's self or family from harm or death can have an awakening effect.

Eldeeder, your statement doesn't make sense. Because liberals are generally insane, they either think that criminals should be the only ones in control, while law-abiding people should be helpless. There is no reason, therefore, why the situation should be "reversed" as you say.

2007-01-01 19:53:09 · answer #5 · answered by Joseph C 5 · 0 2

The gun issue really seems reversed to me, you'd think the liberals would WANT all guns legal while the conservatives would want them all banned, I dont understand this issue...

2007-01-01 19:54:36 · answer #6 · answered by eldeeder 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers