English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If every Century year is not a Leap year. how Shall we distuinguish Year 2100 to not to be a leap year as it is not divisible by 400, but by following from :----
2000 ---- leap year,
2004 ---- leap year,
2008 ---- leap year,
2012 ---- leap year,
2016 ---- leap year,
2020 ---- leap year,
2024 ---- leap year,
2028 ---- leap year,
2032 ---- leap year,
2036 ---- leap year,
2040 ---- leap year,
2044 ---- leap year,
2048 ---- leap year,
2052 ---- leap year,
2056 ---- leap year,
2060 ---- leap year,
2064 ---- leap year,
2068 ---- leap year,
2072 ---- leap year,
2076 ---- leap year,
2080 ---- leap year,
2084 ---- leap year,
2088 ---- leap year,
2092 ---- leap year,
2096 ---- leap year,
so by this way 2100 comes out to be a leap year??????????????
How to solve this problem?????

2007-01-01 18:40:41 · 4 answers · asked by kundan 1 in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

4 answers

It is a leap year. It doesnt have to because its already divisible by 4. 2096 isn't divisible by 400 but its still a leap year

2007-01-01 18:43:55 · answer #1 · answered by dragon52493 1 · 0 1

In the Gregorian calendar, which is the calendar used by most modern countries, the following rules decides which years are leap years:

1. Every year divisible by 4 is a leap year.
2. But every year divisible by 100 is NOT a leap year
3. Unless the year is also divisible by 400, then it is still a leap year.

This means that year 1800, 1900, 2100, 2200, 2300 and 2500 are NOT leap years, while year 2000 and 2400 are leap years.

2007-01-01 18:47:16 · answer #2 · answered by Jerry 7 · 1 0

Dividing by 4 is leap year and not 400. earth takes 365.25 days and once revolved 4 times, four quarter joins to be one day and comes the leap year.

2007-01-01 18:45:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

that is an easy one. If the international gets too warm, we've shown that we can proceed to exist it because of the fact the "Cradles of Civilization" have been in warm, dry aspects. If the international gets chilly, then we've already shown that we can face up to ice a protracted time, and that's with out any "severe" technologies. If the international gets overpopulated, that is going to, out of necessity, stability itself out. i don't think of we'd desire to be concerned approximately surviving the subsequent a hundred years. the actual question is a thank you to we shop the subsequent a hundred years from becoming to be the subsequent darkish Age.

2016-12-15 13:33:29 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers