Yes. I work harder and make less. People make assumptions about my abilities based on my gender. I lost my job because I chose to start a family. The media purports an image of women that is nearly impossible to achieve. Okay, I'm too tired to rant more...but there is more.
2007-01-01 18:39:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by BlueFish 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
We still make .75 cents to the dollar that men make, we are not promoted as often. And then you have guys like "Happy Bullet" promoting anti-woman propaganda and misogyny from a racist and sexist website (click on his first link). that website promotes the repatriation of black people to Africa, (and refers to them using THE racial epithet) claims that Anglo-Saxons are God's "chosen" people" that should solely "rule" America, states that women are intellectually inferior, (actually, it states that women are inferior in every way) and that women should be jailed for adultery. That group is not any better than the KKK. In fact you wouldn't be able to tell them apart. Why would anyone believe a single word printed by this group, with their obvious agenda of hatred for women and all minorities? The KKK doesn't care about real statistics, or the truth. As for his other post, it's nothing but sexism and hatred towards women, the same as the other, only directed solely at women. If he held a position where he was able to promote/hire/fire women, black people or any other minority, for that matter, do you think any of them would have the slightest chance if it weren't for affirmative action? And unfortunately, he is not alone in his sexist and racist views, and it's because of people like him that affirmative action is necessary.
2007-01-01 19:29:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by wendy g 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Well, if you take a look at the stage of the Nobel Prize awards ceremony, you'll note that all of this year's Laureates were men. Furthermore, at least 90% of the people onstage (past laureates, and the Sweedish Royal Family) are wearing tuxes (whch means they're men. And most of the women are Sweedish royals. Hmph.
2007-01-01 18:43:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by kidneyfetishmcjeebus 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Nope , as far as economic society went , I had excellent jobs and a great time .
A few guys had trouble with it but as I always got an equal ( and sometimes bigger ) paycheck . . . I really did not sweat the individual flake.
The job / business / economic society was good to me.
2007-01-01 18:49:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by kate 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Kiss my ***. I lost a management position because it was time to hire a minority group. It happened to be a woman, but it could have been anyone. I think i was mistreated by this society.
2007-01-01 18:38:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by jfrith2799 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
I think it's starting to die off, men are making a little less and women are making slightly more.
2007-01-01 18:42:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
i will experience my boyfriend come interior me. I dont understand if this occurs to everybody yet dont you experience after someons ejaculates interior yoi tje next day you're sexy and you only want to have intercourse back.?!
2016-11-25 21:54:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
They'll "feel", or claim to feel that they are treated poorly as long as it will get them any sympathy or privileges.
In fact, it is now MEN rather than women who are treated poorly by American society:
http://christianparty.net/discmen.htm
EDIT: Okay they've said yes, they're ridiculous:
http://dontgetmarried.proboards75.com/
To join the fight against their delusional ridiculousness.
2007-01-01 18:39:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by Happy Bullet 3
·
2⤊
4⤋
hmm interesting. . i ve never been to the states but these statistics prove quit alot
2007-01-01 20:01:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by coco 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
anyone who says yes is completely ridiculous
2007-01-01 18:38:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋