2007-01-01 18:33:28 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Whoever angers the terrorist angers the liberals equally.
2007-01-01 18:41:23 · answer #1 · answered by MorgantonNC 4 · 2⤊ 4⤋
I think Rush that harmless little fuzzball with half his brain tied behind his back just to make it fair has a bigger audiance. Rush uses more humor then Savage but Michael says it like it is. For some to say Rush is boring either has no sense of humor or is pretty much brain dead or has never listened to him more then 5 minutes. Why do you suppose he has more listeners then air America ever dreamed of having? Can 20-30 million people who listen every day or almost every day be so wrong in their judgement? I try to listen to Air America mostly to see if it's still on because of going bankrupt. But just can't after about 10 minutes all I ever hear is screaming yelling they are always so angry! I have an open mind but I never hear any positive ideas from them just whining about how bad Bush is. Now that my friends is boring! But we all have our own tastes, likes and dislikes, that's what makes the world go 'round. Main thing for me I guess is I like to laugh and I do make up my own mind with facts. Something that liberal followers seem to shy away from. Bush and co. are not perfect, far from it! But I cringe at the thought of Al Gore or Kerry being president through the times we've had in the past 7 years.
2007-01-01 19:16:44 · answer #2 · answered by crusinthru 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think Rush angers more liberals, because he is heard by more of them.
But I'll bet that Michael Savage angers them more. He claims that Bush is not a conservative ... meaning not nearly as conservative as he (Michael Savage) is. So his views have to make liberals really angry (if they ever listen).
2007-01-01 18:50:52 · answer #3 · answered by actuator 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Probably Linbaugh, but Bush angers them more than Limbaugh & Savage combined.
2007-01-01 18:39:10 · answer #4 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Rush, Savage at least makes you think, but Rush is disgusting with his spewing bs, and his appearance as well creates an image that no party in their 'right' mind would like as a spokesperson.
2007-01-01 23:55:31 · answer #5 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would say Rush because some really diehard cons give him credit even though he's a druggie. To the people who said Coulter- she's a joke. Even a rep with an eighth of a brain can see her insanity. She want's to revoke voting rights for women!
2007-01-01 19:33:16 · answer #6 · answered by of_bright_lights 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Savage is far off the deep end he can't be taken seriously by any sane person.
Limbaugh is a meaningless comedian.
2007-01-01 19:31:07 · answer #7 · answered by bettysdad 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't say "angers", I'd use the word "amuse". If I had to pick one it'd be my buddy Rush. He has shut himself out of any moral issues because he's a pill addict and has been married 3 times.
2007-01-01 18:58:46 · answer #8 · answered by gone 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Well its funny because Rush, Hanniity, Reagan and a slew of others are all extremely popular. I wonder why the democratic answer to conservative talk ended up bankrupt.
2007-01-01 18:47:06 · answer #9 · answered by olympikdude 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
i am not a liberal, but i would have to say rush limbaugh. i really do not like that guys views.
2007-01-01 18:46:46 · answer #10 · answered by Joe S 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Rush annoys me more because at least Michael Savage is educated and entertaining. Rush is just ignorant, dull and predictable, not unlike his listeners.
2007-01-01 18:36:06 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋