I only do a couple of questions a day that interest me, or seem to be getting some misleading or incorrect responses, or is something I'm unusually well-versed in, so I sometimes spend enough time for it to look like a lot of "cutnpaste". When I do "cutnpaste" tho, I put it in quotes and name the source, often wikipedia. BTW, part of the reason I enjoy responding is that it sometimes makes a good excuse to research some area of interest, or at least verify or improve what I know about one.
2007-01-01 18:08:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Gary H 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I typically answer interesting questions about which I have a lot of my own acquired knowledge, so most of my longest answers are my own. If I cut and paste, it's usually something I feel like the user will need me to back up with a resource, and/or something that isn't easily located within a link I might provide. I do feel it's important to distinguish what is your own, and what was resourced elsewhere.
2007-01-01 18:28:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by clhseattle 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Usually they copy and paste as it is easier than typing in your own knowledge.
2007-01-01 18:11:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Unazaki 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Both. Dpends on the person and if what they are saying is their knowledge or something they looked up.
2007-01-01 17:59:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by purple dove 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I do both.
2007-01-01 17:58:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Paca 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
both
2007-01-01 17:59:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by weazalus 3
·
0⤊
0⤋