Media says that untill now its not clear that wo hanged sadam!! few news say that till recent saddam was in US captive, so indirectly it says US govt. had hands in his death sentence. Does Bush wants to eliminated muslim community by divide and rule policy. Will this happen or will it have another attack on US by Muslims or the chritianity will be targeted by OSAM BIN LADAN.
2007-01-01 16:35:23 · 18 answers · asked by nag_bobs 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
wooo im really biffed now !
oh the river clyde .......
help ..wagon im gone
2007-01-01 16:37:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
This is an internal problem they have always had amongst muslims. They dont get along anymore than the Lutheran's and the Catholic's and they are both Christian, or the Zionists and the Reformed Jewish people here in America, There are all sects in any religion and they have been fighting for years, no Bush or anyone else can change those differences. But as far as a US involvement in his hanging I would say it was a long time coming since Desert Storm, it might have been an vendetta that junior took personal about his Dad Bush but as a president of Iraq he was a brutal tyrant and his peers made the decision of his hanging so US is not alone, Great Britain, most of Europe as well. Osama Bin Ladin is not a threat he is an enigma. But shame on anyone that does terrorism on anyone. That is the dirtiest sneakiest snake to attack innocent people, why not draw down and face your enemy in the open? What is it they want anyway? They are not going to take over America and they are not getting rid of us and our religions they should just take care of their own problems and get some indoor plumbing and better hygiene for their starving people and never mind about us we take care of our own and they found that out in a big way now.
2007-01-01 16:48:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It may surprise you, but George Bush does not make the world turn and cause every effect therein.
The Iraqi courts convicted Saddam of crimes he had committed. The Iraqi government put
Saddam to death as his sentence and also so he wouldn't be a figurehead for the insurgents to rally around.
There has been trouble between the Sunnis and Shiites prior to the US going in. Al-Sadr has been having his militia killing Sunnis to try to start a civil war. Al-Sadr's father was killed by Saddam, so hopefully he will begin to cooperate with the elected government now.
His militia incites much of the trouble in Baghdad.
Al Queda and Osama will continue to target the west, especially the US whenever they find a way to attack.
2007-01-01 16:52:01 · answer #3 · answered by Susan M 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The execution of Saddam is not to divide the Sunnis & Shiite as they have always been divided since centuries ago.
Unfortunately, Saddam's death will not bring about peace as
a) the Sunnis & Shi'ites are still at one anothers' throat - eg, the Iranians vs the other Arab states
b) Moqtadar al Sadr, Osama Bin Laden, Al Zawahiri & the other big terrorists are still at large
2007-01-01 16:55:50 · answer #4 · answered by Kevin F 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You seem like a nice guy. Think it through, please.
Bush has NOTHING to gain by promoting problems between the two sects. His only chance of success is in uniting the two. If Sunni and Shiite put aside their differences tomorrow, the U.S. could leave Iraq tomorrow. At this point, the main reason the troops are there is because the two groups are fighting each other.
2007-01-01 17:39:08 · answer #5 · answered by Benji 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Peace will be established not by killing Saddam but by charity. Saddam hanged by Iraqi law, while Iraqi law not similar with peace, don't be confuse and spread bad issue, no relation between those matters. Why should Bush need to create problem between them? they have their own problem already, it had been proved that they are not united. Got it?
2007-01-01 19:06:31 · answer #6 · answered by John V 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sunnis and Shiites have been killing each other for about 550 years.
As fas as Saddam goes, he is the embodiment of the old Western phrase "Hanging's too good for him"
2007-01-02 01:05:37 · answer #7 · answered by yankee_sailor 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it all stinks . the whole thing . this whole Iraq thing has been planned for over 40 years and its going to take another 5-6 years to complete. USA created Saddam so they can deal with him . if Saddam was a good guy then the USA would have had no excuse to invade and make bases anywhere in the middle east. all you have to do is look at the pictures of Donald rumsfeld shaking Saddam's hand the hand of such an evil man. who gained and who benefits from this war ? if you find that out then its easy to see why we invaded Iraq . i just feel sorry for the American people they have given all there power to a minority of evil people and they are exploiting them. we all now America is the best democracy money can buy and every time these people get in power the get more rich.then they buy more democracy . we all know that there is going to be another Bush who's going to be president. democracy in America???? what a laugh.
2007-01-01 16:49:49 · answer #8 · answered by rocco s 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
After watching what has been happening in Iraq over the last several years you have to have a lot of faith to think Bush has a plan, or even knows what is going on.
2007-01-01 20:58:54 · answer #9 · answered by meg 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was the new government that decided on the death penalty for Saddam during his trials, for a conviction of crimes against humanity. Also, he was not a "US captive". He was guarded by Americans but was in the custody of the Iraqis.
2007-01-01 16:51:23 · answer #10 · answered by Smart Blonde 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I would hardly think Bush would want any more proplems than he has got already, the muslims do not have to be helped divide themselves they are doing a pretty good job on there own
2007-01-01 20:17:45 · answer #11 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋