2007-01-01 14:27:20 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
ofcourse it will. Natural death is only the result of ageing and some organ disfunctions. At present our technology is not that advanced or sophisticated to monitor and control our internal processes. But soon a day is coming where nanotechnology is gonna revolutionize this world. With the advent of this an 'everlasting you' won't be distant.
Nanotechnology is not a fiction, but it's something which is gonna make those fictions into a reality..Expect it soon...Maybe 2030....2020...2010 ....or even ????
2007-01-01 14:47:40 · answer #1 · answered by Richy R 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes it is called ex-lax. ha ha Happy New Year. But seriously are you kidding? No it is not possible for the human to live indefinately past the time of his/her body expiration time. The thing you should be hoping for is the cure for Cancer so some can live past the age of children. There are way too many people in this world and then if there was no death and just continuation of childbirth there would not be enough room. Clones are being made to find the perfect fetus, so that we can eliminate diseases, but that is futile the person could get some new airborne virus and die from that as well or a truck could hit them. So why bother with cloning find the cures for those that are already living, right? Life is everlasting but not in these bodies. Sorry Charlie only the best tasting tuna gets to be Starkist.
2007-01-01 15:34:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, since all material things are subject to corruption, the best science could/might be able to produce is a method of preventing corruption and extending life by replacing natural organs and parts. Everlasting life could not be achieved through natural means.
2007-01-01 14:51:24 · answer #3 · answered by checkhead 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes. However it will only be given to those that are considered worth keeping alive by those in charge of distributing it (or those that have the money to pay for it). And since such a substance would be under the control of an organization like the FDA well..most of us would be screwed and oly the very rich...the elite would have access to it...average people like us wouldn't.
2007-01-01 14:58:01 · answer #4 · answered by kveldulf_gondlir 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It doesn't need to. Life is already everlasting, simply not in the form that we're accustomed to in this physical dimension. Thank goodness!
2007-01-01 15:11:24 · answer #5 · answered by LindaLou 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you mean like a scientifically invented Fountain of Youth. Well, i hope so. Perhaps we can start living like those in the Old Testament -- living till we're 200 yrs or 500 yrs old. It would definitely change the health care industry.
:-)
2007-01-01 15:55:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Already found john 3:16-17
2007-01-01 14:29:17 · answer #7 · answered by tom4bucs 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
WHY?????????????
Aren't we already over populated and indulged enough as is?
Would you then suggest that Euthenasia be OK?
Would you consider mandatory sterilzation, as a GLOBAL LAW?
No offense,,,SIGH,,, define "potient"
2007-01-01 14:51:28 · answer #8 · answered by DIY Doc 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No science will never out power god god does not want us to live forever on earth
2007-01-01 15:21:00 · answer #9 · answered by Missbribri 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO Way
Only God can give us an everlasting life.......and that is in the spiritual realm
2007-01-01 14:41:32 · answer #10 · answered by clcalifornia 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋