I know that there are genetic studies that show there is at least a 10% genetic difference between caucasians and negroes, and intelligence tests show negroes are at least 20% less intelligent,
but with such large headstart, why are negroes still so far behind?
2007-01-01
13:58:41
·
31 answers
·
asked by
jeandeux@sbcglobal.net
1
in
Social Science
➔ Anthropology
I know that there are genetic studies that show there is at least a 10% genetic difference between caucasians and negroes, and intelligence tests show negroes are at least 20% less intelligent,
but with such large headstart, why are negroes still so far behind?
a few rebuttals:
The national IQ of ethiopia is 64, american ***** is 80
the latest DNA study states there is at least a 10% diff., read the news!
the last ice age ended 11k years ago
Arabs, white rhodesians and south africans had no problem with agriculture or any other "enviromental" conditions
2007-01-01
14:49:39 ·
update #1
This is esp. for the jack a s s "TK", a fag
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/science_technology/article2007490.ece
2007-01-05
10:40:07 ·
update #2
I don't know what intelligence tests you have been studying, but as an educator who administers those same tests, I think you have your racist head up one of your body parts.
Get a clue, read a book, and say something like this to somebody's face so they can answer you in person.
2007-01-01 14:04:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by luvmelodio 4
·
7⤊
11⤋
you could be just lashing out, stirring up trouble. but first less look at a couple of facts: the 10% genetic difference is absolutely wrong. as far as the intelligence tests, that was once thought true but it was the poorly designed tests to blame. there may be a difference but it not clear. the white society has helped raise the blacks from off the floor and the blacks have come a long way. only time will tell. where did you get such stats? from an ayrian brotherhood site on the web or else you just made that up. using the term ***** is not likely to be a slip of the keyboard..
2007-01-01 14:19:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Well you have to explain intelligence,what does it means.Who voted for Bush not 1 but 2 elections in a row.I can safely say those blacks didnt....are they just dumb? are what?How smart do you have to be to watch what happened to the people in New Orleans during Katrina.
Who was dumb? the blacks that was there are the very white federal government in charge that the world looked on with horror as it unfolded.What about the our revenge for 9/11,blacks overwhelming said get Osama but dont go to war with Iraq.But the intelligent whites decided Iraq is more important than Osama.Over 600,000 Iraqis lives(dont even try and count the wounded),3000 American soldiers and over 50,000 wounded.Yes my dear brother these are Yale,Harvard,Stanford and Princeton graduates with high IQ making these decisions.And dont forget the high IQ's that arranged Saddam hanging which is now on video all over the world.How about that for increasing the hatred amonst a billion muslims.So while you sit and measure your high IQ and the CEO's strip this country of middle class jobs and one day you'll be fighting a black person for that Burger King position.that application may ask a lot of questions but one it wont ask...how high is your IQ?
2007-01-02 09:09:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Look man your a product of your environment IQ test in Ethiopia is not accurate I'm not black And I don't believe the black race has a lower IQ. IQ is based on knowledge if you have read it you will know it People in Ethiopia are probably just ignorant that means poor education where are your facts from dude. Black people differ biologically there bone structure is denser testosterone levels are a bit higher that does not mean they are stupid in terms of IQ
in fact diet could be related to testosterone so that could even out with the right nutrients like b vitamins or zinc found in a high protein diet. I really don't believe that Samuel L Jackson is stupid
he may be a math whiz who knows.
2007-01-02 16:04:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
They're primitive because they are intellectually challenged and luckily for them they also are physically gifted in sports compared to other races. Unfortunately no one challenges them about this due to the fact that it's considered "racist" to do so. This is the reason why they will lead all negative statistics such as crime, out-of-wedlock births(which we pay for), poverty, and many more.
I find it funny that many consider the negroes in America are under a greater challenge from society, actually far from it. When the boat people came from SE Asia they had to endure racism (mostly from negroes), language barrier (the negroes are at least raised in an English speaking households, well sort of), cultural shock difference, no political action/special interest groups (NAACP), and no AA to boost their assimilation into the american society. Their population totals less in numbers to the ***** yet no AA, less in percentage index in all negative categories (dropping out of high school, prison population representation, bastard birthings, welfare recipients, etc), and not blaming "Whitey" for all their problems should make many question why are they doing better and negroes are failing compared to them?
We could be even more mean with more comparisons and go into details about how Mexicans, South American Indians, Asian Indians, Arabs (Asia and Africa), and other Oriental Asians coming to America doing better as well but even negroes from other parts (Haitians, Africa, Middle East, etc) than the native ones already here fail as well should make people ask another question, why do negroes fail compared to the other non-White races? It may be too many people are too scared to question the truth, deep down we know the answers people aren't equal we see this in sports (in America you don't see too many Arabs, Orientals, jews, etc in relation to their population density), science, entertainment, and school but also we see it on TV looking at other countries and their respective developement (first world/third world).
2007-01-03 08:42:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by FORK T 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
I will allow others here, incorrectly, or not , ideologically ,or not, castigate you on this issue. I have only one point to make. The " ***** race ", as you so quaintly put it, IS NOT 50,000 OLDER THAN OTHER RACES. It is no surprise that these social scientist did not catch this glaring error. The out of Africa and all other emergent from Africa theories have the Homo sapient race at the same approximate age, do primarily to a " Bottle neck " effect about 100,000 years ago. We are a " small species " and have a very small ancestor pool. Your ignorance of basic genetics and evolutionary science saves me the trouble of addressing your other so-called points.
2007-01-01 15:22:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Wow, that is a loaded question. Not that I agree with you but you are probable referring to undeveloped African nations. And if that is the case I would have to say opportunity and diet are the keys. If your world is limited then you will be limited.
If you are talking about our poor youth in America's ghettos, I would again say oppertunity and diet and add upbringing and envirnment.
I know a lot of negroes that have more intelligence than me and I'm above average. And if you think about it real hard, the same will apply to you.
2007-01-01 14:13:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by foreverquilting2003 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
Another case of using statistics incorrectly. 20% of testing the poor inner city youth agaist the rich whites?? test a black medical doctor and a white medical doctor and the results will be about the same, they will end up playing golf together. If you judge any supressed group they will test lower, including whites in the mountains of georgia in the 50's. Good hard working pwople who had less opertunities. As far as Africa goes there are many very delveloped cities that have the exact same problems that the cities in the United States have. Many run by very intelligent blacks with good intentions, that sometimes work. Consider Bush as the alternative.
2007-01-01 14:16:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Carl P 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
I believe there is a great deal of difference among the races. Are whites the smartest? I would have to say no if I.Q. test are any indication. (I believe I.Q. test do measure certain innate abilities) In regards to raw intelligence I will have to go with the Northeast Asians as being the most intelligent followed closely by caucasians of European descent. As for the African *****, I believe that they are less intelligent than your other worldly races.
Of course there are exceptions to this rule. However taking into account their current status in the world virtually everywhere they dwell from Los Angeles to Dharfur we can see a pattern. Taking into account their historical lack of progress in any field such as art, medicine, science, architecture, etc we can defenitely see a pattern. Taking into account the African *****'s inability to sustain a modern society in any recognizable form while being the dominant majority. (Detroit would be in the same situation as Somalia without federal government bail out programs) We can see a pattern. Now hear me when I say that I am no racist, however I do not run from or deny the truth. I also believe the reason why there is so much black on white violent crime in your country is due to the fact that your media promotes the hatred of whites. You see the fact that the African ***** has (in general) failed in your society has only one of two explanations. 1) White Racism. Or 2) Black ineptitude. However since no one in the media can claim number 2 for obvious reasons then all black failure must be ascribed to #1. This in return causes much hatred within the African American ***** because his whole life he will be told white racism is the reason he did not succeed in this or that. I Apologize for any mispellings as English is not my dominant tongue. (Living and working in the nation of my blood I do not use English as much as I use to while living and working in the United States)The nation I am from was communist my entire childhood, as well as my early adult life. Within a little over a decade after freeing ourselves of that most destructive political ideology my nation is getting back on it's feet. It is odd to me that there are topics in the "free" western world that can ruin a man's career in the same manner in which it could ruin our career when we were suffering under communism.
2007-01-02 04:12:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Hernan 1
·
2⤊
3⤋
its not that theyre more primitive its their upbringing, they had such a rough start in america, starting out as slaves and we never truly given them any time to catch up because we had the guns first and since its human nature to be greedy and generally evil, we always look for more things for ourselves, if their is some for them, there is less for us. it all really comes down to how you are brought up, most african americans do poorly because of an underprivliged childhood in a neighborhood that had a crummy school, while most white children live in a nice clean suburb and go to nice schools with good teachers. Genetics? that may be because of a theory that all people started in africa and while some stayed, others left and had to adapt to the conditions starting some change in genetics, more or less genes doesnt neccesarily mean you are supieror or inferior to another person
2007-01-01 14:12:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
SP,
"African American" does NOT refer to race, ***** does. "African American" describes someone who has come to America from Afirca and now lives. Arabs and Whites come from Africa and resettle in America all the time. Do you refer to them as "African Americans"? People from Tunisia? Libya? Egypt? Whites from South Africa? Do you refer to ****** living in Germany, "African Americans"? What about ****** living in primitive straw huts in the Congo? Are they "African Americans"?
See how utterly silly you are? How PC brainwashed do you have to be to use such a silly term as "African American"? If you called a ***** that in Zimbabwe, he would spear you, skin you, and boil you for dinner ! LMAO.
2007-01-01 14:28:42
·
answer #11
·
answered by James R 1
·
8⤊
0⤋