i just need to know!
2007-01-01 12:35:28 · 13 answers · asked by princess 1 in Beauty & Style ➔ Fashion & Accessories
Gucci if you can afford it, baby phat it's cheaper and it works better for a teenager
2007-01-01 13:35:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think it depends on your style. i think baby phat is very common and cheap but gucci has better clothes but at a higher price. i like baby phat though!
2007-01-01 13:26:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Gucci
2007-01-01 12:43:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Baby Phat cuz more people know what Baby Phat is
2007-01-01 12:42:52 · answer #4 · answered by soulja girl 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i would like gucci better, alot of Baby Phat is like bling bling and i think its tacky!
2007-01-01 12:57:37 · answer #5 · answered by ziddyziddy 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
baby phat
2007-01-01 14:08:22 · answer #6 · answered by teetee p 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Wale ft woman Gaga - chillin' Sugababes - No can do Pixie Lott - boys and women Taio Cruz - Brake your heart Pitbull - i understand you want me Mr hudson ft Kayne West - Supanova 30H!3 - don't have self assurance me Black eyed peas - ive were given a feeling David Guetta ft Akon - horny ***** (or chick) Eminem - The caution Mariah Carey - Obsessed sorry in case you arn't into that style of track they're only the songs i love atm
2016-12-01 10:09:26 · answer #7 · answered by brenneman 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Baby phat. Clothes are extremely sexy and versatile.
2007-01-01 13:03:00 · answer #8 · answered by browncutie 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Gucci all the way. Louise Vutton is better.
2007-01-01 12:38:27 · answer #9 · answered by Good Grief 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
they're both really cute but i'd have to go with Gucci.
2007-01-01 12:37:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋