why do they feel the need to show history or historical figures in a different light than they actually happened or existed.
like for instance, braveheart.
they show william wallace as this great warrior, and like as if he was all good. fair enough, he did do alot of good. but he was a brutal and, practically a vicious psychopath, he was also a cannibal. again, i'm not putting the guy down, he did what he felt he had to do.
but why do hollywood miss out points like that, surely these points would of made the character more true to life, and believable.
mel gibson says in an interview on the 2 disc dvd of braveheart that wallace had a rep for skinning some of the people he faught.
yet they don't even hint at any of this in the movie?
even if that had of shown gibson with some blood around his mouth, you'd realise what he had been doing.
2007-01-01
12:32:27
·
2 answers
·
asked by
Brutal_Yet_Beautiful
2
in
Entertainment & Music
➔ Movies
the film is brilliant as it is, but, it just annoys me when hollywood aren't accurate.
2007-01-01
12:33:51 ·
update #1
another example is all these western films who show native americans as savages, when they couldnt of been that savage, or they wouldnt of survived so long.
2007-01-01
12:35:11 ·
update #2
if they were even savage at all.....before the american army started murdering them
2007-01-01
12:35:53 ·
update #3