Face it, if a person was cloned from another person who has no real country, would they person be illegal by American standards? The cloned person wasn't born, but created by science. What's your own thoughts on this matter?
2007-01-01 12:29:43 · 25 answers · asked by ZORRO 3 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Alternative ➔ Other - Alternative
No because they were made here. The government stipulates that any birth in the US is a legal citizen
2007-01-01 18:02:45 · answer #1 · answered by sugarpacketchad 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well, first of all, all people are born. Even if they were created by science. All clones have to born. They're DNA is injected into a female of that species and they are developed into the thing that it will be. They are then born. It also depends where they were born. If a person is born in the United States, they are automatically a citizen of the US. I think that applies to all countries as well.
2007-01-02 05:02:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I thought you meant ...If someoned robbed your ovaries
during an ceseraen or other medical malpractice ,Then therefore
they can "clone" you ,those puppies would otherwise go for minimum 10,000 a piece.And if who did used the "black market"
and sold your "eggs" they could keep them fertile by transporting them via a freaking "pet shop" inside a "hamster" This represents
foriegn countries,There they can impregnate "Your" cell into
another womb ,,,all which eventually noone being the wiser,
But if that stolen robbed makingst of yourself(assumably)
Was procreated then born in another country that would make
them an immagrant.Except whats any of that got to do with a "clone" That stuffs no good! Plain and simple
2007-01-02 15:36:28 · answer #3 · answered by All Peaches an cream 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. That person would be born in the US. And YES cloned people would pass through a womb. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A TEST TUBE BABY. When something is cloned the fetus is placed in the parent's womb after artificial conception. Check out this site for further information: http://www3.iptv.org/exploremore/ge/what/clone.cfm
2007-01-01 18:12:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
My heart say yes they would be freaks of nature generated by people striving to be a god. My resoning manipulated by todays standards will say no the cloned thing will be an American due to going through a birthing process on USA soil.
2007-01-03 10:15:33 · answer #5 · answered by texashonor 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no because the cloned person would be a baby. similar to the test tube babies. (not be an adult when created) so a birth cert would have to be applied for by the "parents" along with a ss number. plus if the people who cloned the baby were American citizens the baby would be considered an American citizen from birth.
2007-01-01 16:29:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
A clone would still have to been grown from and embryo, and raised, like a test tube baby. It wont ever be possible to have a clone just pop into existance. Sqaying a clone has no country is like saying any child concieved through in vitro has no country.
2007-01-01 21:53:19 · answer #7 · answered by Mabus 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Oh, this is SUCH a juicy legal question! Love it. Depends how the person was born, or incubated. If born to a mother, even by in-vitro fertilization, then legally it's a natural born US citizen. Why? There is nothing in the law precluding citizenship to persons born to mothers of US citizenship on account of how she was fertilized. However, if the person was incubated in a jar and no birth surrogate mother, then obviously he/she wasn't NATURALLY born, so legally his/her citizenship could be challenged. Great fodder for legal and legislative battles, this one. Movie plot, anyone?
Addendum: If there is no surrogate mother, then provenance becomes of paramount issue. For example, can it be established that the embryo-in-the-jar wasn't created in a foreign country, only smuggled in later? What's the difference between that and a smuggled-in baby alien? For clones, it could be argued that the donor is a US citizen, but, again, there exists no law about that, which is why it could easily be challenged, unless there was at least a surrogate mother of US citizenship.
2007-01-01 12:44:12 · answer #8 · answered by Scythian1950 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No yet they are doing the jobs that *human beings won't. You seem as once you try to belittle them and cause them to seem 'lazy'. nicely, they are not. it is not "black Americas' " job to %. end result and vegetables. human beings in maximum situations are not in many circumstances in want of doing agricultural hard work interior the bleeding warm sunlight with little breaks for hours upon hours. no longer some thing i might do. might you? it is confusing artwork and could pay little or no money. So no, it is not a 'black' subject. and to no longer point obtainable are some who do...what makes you think of each and every black American has the comparable attitude,ideals or professions? Is that no longer generalizing?
2016-11-25 21:15:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the person was cloned in the U.S. I think they would be a legal U.S. resident. Being an illegal alien implies that they crossed a border into the U.S. illegally.
2007-01-02 04:27:07 · answer #10 · answered by Pfo 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Good question. Impossible to answer as there has been no legal precedent set, and let's hope there never is. Unless it is a clone of Anne Heche for retail sale of course.
2007-01-02 03:31:20 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋