He has set the situation so that you can prevent the medication induced abortion of an embryo within a young woman or the euthanasia of Koko (the sign language gorilla http://www.koko.org/ ).
You have reason to believe that they have both been placed in the situation against their will.
It appears to me that choosing Koko denies:
1)The embryo's right to life.
2)The right of the mother to choose.
What do you think?
2007-01-01 11:28:37 · 7 answers · asked by BigPappa 5 in Family & Relationships ➔ Other - Family & Relationships
Mustanglady, well, if you're hobby was moral philosophy rather than mustangs, maybe you'de understand me better.
2007-01-01 13:16:36 · update #1
yeah but there are plenty of embryos...but only one koko!!!
i would choose koko!!!
2007-01-01 11:35:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
1
2007-01-01 19:31:28 · answer #2 · answered by flowerz 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd save Koko.
2007-01-01 19:38:38 · answer #3 · answered by Ice Q 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
te mother has the right to choose its her body and her responsibility if she choose to abort koko its her decision nobody can condemmed her if her reasons are valid.
2007-01-01 21:59:00 · answer #4 · answered by lina i 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would personally choose the embryo.
2007-01-01 19:59:23 · answer #5 · answered by Mayonaise 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
2) the right to choose as they were placed in that situation against their will.
2007-01-01 19:35:24 · answer #6 · answered by lara 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you have way too much time on ur hands!
2007-01-01 21:01:06 · answer #7 · answered by mustanglady 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋