2007-01-01 07:55:17 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Sociology
GUILTY!!! Guilty as Sin! Without a doubt! If he had been caught in the act he couldn't be more guilty! He is a narcissist and only cares about himself. He considered a family a hindrance to his view of himself and his world. I doubt he even thinks about her or the baby. Couldn't be bothered!
2007-01-01 08:05:19 · answer #1 · answered by Sweet Gran 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The trial was all over the news for months. All the court room maneuvering was open. The defense was winning the trial, for a while. Then the physical evidence and the circumstantial evidence just became overwhelming, as the prosecution planned. Did you not see this? He was convicted beyond a shadow of a doubt.
2007-01-01 15:55:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There probably isn't enough evidence if he's got a really good lawyer. For example, they had a knife, the bodies, the bloody glove, and OJ still walked.
2007-01-01 08:03:42 · answer #3 · answered by Big Perm 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
merely bear in mind that the exhibits that prepare well-known homicide situations seldom use all the info against the accused. i've got considered exhibits that want to place some threads of doubt obtainable, maximum probable to maintain human beings fascinated interior the case, or to place some validity into an allure.
2016-11-25 20:40:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am sure that slime ball did it. He had changed his appearance and gathered a lot of cash preparing to cross the Mexican border. Even a two year old could have served on that jury and found him guilty!
2007-01-01 08:22:42 · answer #5 · answered by robee 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He definetly He definetly did it for sure. Please, its been 4 yrs ago since that day and 2 yrs ago since he was find quilty, so on. Wish he just could executed since the judge said so 2 yrs ago instead that he could appeal or etc. Please, read For Laci: A Mother's Story if Love, Loss, and Justice, Sharon Rocha (Laci's Mother and Connor's Grandmother).
2007-01-01 08:05:25 · answer #6 · answered by Jessica A 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes and Yes
2007-01-01 08:02:08 · answer #7 · answered by bugjrmom 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Moot question, he's history. YES he did it and if you are thinking about writing him some sympathetic letter, go get yourself a PET instead---you'll be much better off psychologically.
2007-01-01 08:48:31 · answer #8 · answered by XOXOXOXO 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes he did it. What motive would anyone else have to commit such a horrendous crime?
OJ Murderer did it too. Those pinheads that acquitted him should be flogged.
2007-01-01 08:03:21 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Have I fallen into a time warp?
2007-01-01 10:30:34 · answer #10 · answered by heart o' gold 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋