Wat si da piont in hanging Saddam wen he either gassed da peeps or shot dem he should of been shot in da legs and arms and been left to bleed 2 death or somung like dat.Wat do u thing should of happened 2 him?
2007-01-01 07:44:42 · 27 answers · asked by afrojo211 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
yeah.. i think your right... he shouldnt have got hung cuz he didnt suffer none... they should have just shot him and just left him there to bleed to death
2007-01-01 07:57:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
The Saddam Hussein death penalty was carried out in a way that showed us just how awful we can be as human beings. It was unjust. He was a dictator yes and he killed many of his own people with poison gas etc etc. But today the country is still in a shambles and 1.5 million Iraqis have been killed by the coalition forces since Iraq was invaded. Who should go to the gallows for that? And when do the war crimes trials begin?
2016-03-29 03:26:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It fuels the political need for creating a division between the democratic(?) and Muslim worlds. Lets see how many more laws can be fast tracked through government under the guise of terrorism this year!
2007-01-01 07:53:55 · answer #3 · answered by forge close folks 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
O.K. You just butchered the English language. Even hanging is known to make the victim suffer as you are saying Saddam should have suffered before he died. I don't believe in capital punishment and believe life in prison would have suited him better. You are a very cruel person for saying that someone should suffer.
2007-01-01 07:54:00 · answer #4 · answered by ╦╩╔╩╦ O.J. ╔╩╦╠═ 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
There is no point in killing him. what have they achieved today just more misery for the people of Iraq. He should have been jailed for life or sent on exile to third country
2007-01-03 00:45:04 · answer #5 · answered by maliamugu 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You're wright, no point, but knowing three years in advance that they were going to put a rope around his neck was sufficient.. Happy New Year!..☺
2007-01-01 08:52:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
That wasn't Saddam!!! I bet it wasn't. The government is so corrupt they probably let him go free here in America and gave Iraq a phony, or Iraq's government killed a fake and let the real one go free in Iraq with a promise to never show his face again.
2007-01-01 07:49:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous 2 · 0⤊ 4⤋
They should have kept him locked up with thousands of photos of Cherie Blair on the walls of his cell,,he would have killed himself in the end
2007-01-01 12:40:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
They hung him for poor spelling and vocabulary so BE CAREFUL! "Wat", "da", "wen", "da", "somung"?.....did you study English at the Saddam School of Skullduggery? And, you actually have a computer? Oh, your question, such as it is - he was guilty of war crimes...look that up in your Thesaurus.
2007-01-01 07:55:23 · answer #9 · answered by SUZI S 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Lethal injection, because it is the most humane way and we don't want to stoop to his level of torture.
2007-01-01 07:54:11 · answer #10 · answered by shoop.dogg 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋