At the molecular level are infinite complexities exists and within are infinite informations. Information are raw data formed to convey meaningful communication and interpretation.
2007-01-01 07:27:10 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Biology
Fine, but the difficulty is thinking that information must come from an intelligence. There are many situations in nature where complexity happens without an intervening intelligence.
2007-01-01 07:30:04 · answer #1 · answered by mathematician 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
What makes you think any of what you said is missed by scientist?
You are reading too many nonsense creationist sites, and you are being misinformed. The fact is, information and how it is transformed, duplicated and inherited is a big part of modern evolutionary theory.
Look up genetics, study DNA. Check out information theory, the founder was a guy named Claude Shannon. Science knows this (heck, they did the work) and information and genetics is a part of the neo-darwin theory.
Nothing you have commented on about information is at all an issue with evolution. And your first sentence is wrong, intelligence is not the same as information.
Start with www.talkorigins.org
Seriously, you have been misinformed.
2007-01-02 01:04:32 · answer #2 · answered by RjKardo 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Intelligence is not information. I define intelligence as the ability to notice, interpret and decide action based upon relevant information. They are connected, but they are not synonymous.
I would define information as visual, auditory and remembered data that can be observed in some manner.
There may be infinite complexities at the molecular, atomic and sub-atomic levels. But if you consider intelligence to be one-and-the-same as information, would you really consider intelligence to be, "raw data formed to convey meaningful communication and interpretation"? How can intelligence be data? Are you suggesting that the facts analyze themselves?
Give me a break.
2007-01-01 15:36:05 · answer #3 · answered by wood_vulture 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
How smart Do you think the N.S.A is 200 years ago dirt floors!?
How smart Do you think the N.S.A is 200 years ago dirt floors!
do they not think a higher inetllgnece that made the billions of computational d.n.a that they have found on this planet and yet what they are doing know There are knows knowns and unknows and they have taken all technolgy away 1950 never happen!!!!
www.beyond-science.com www.beyond-science.net
2007-01-01 17:48:14 · answer #4 · answered by zetabinary 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Stop reading creation websites and start reading some science books and journals. You might understand it better if you actually got the information from scientists rather than getting it from creationists.
2007-01-01 16:21:23 · answer #5 · answered by Chris S 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
This kind of discussion boils down to a person's inability to imagine that something just is; they can't imagine something being complex without having a creator.
2007-01-01 15:36:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
they fail to understand that something so complex as the relaying of information regarding cause of death back to the currently living and then all future generations is nothing short of a miricle
2007-01-01 15:30:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
And what does this have to do with evolution?
Evolution is science. Science is inherently agnostic.
2007-01-01 15:30:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋