2007-01-01 07:15:14 · 8 answers · asked by Blue Sun 2 in Sports ➔ Baseball
The Giants had no interest in signing Bonds with 22 home runs to go. He was the last thing they were concerned about. They were forced to sign him this because they could not find a solid replacement for him in right field. The poor club was cornerered into giving him that ridiculous salary because of it as well.
2007-01-01 13:06:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
No. That would be too far and not possible for him in one year at his age. Bonds only came back to break the record. He would have retired if he was two years away. Giants know that it is profitable to bring him back this year.
2007-01-01 15:45:26 · answer #2 · answered by PearApple 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Giants would have signed him! They know without him they would lose 100 games!!!
2007-01-01 16:18:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
nope barry bonds would have been forced to retire because as it is nobody was interested in him this offseason to begin with hell the giants bid against themselves
2007-01-01 09:08:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
They would have signed him but probably for not as much...nobody would have.
2007-01-01 08:20:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
no
2007-01-01 07:48:56 · answer #6 · answered by Bryan M 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No.
2007-01-01 07:42:48 · answer #7 · answered by fostermark_2000 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
PROBABLY NOT
2007-01-02 03:04:33 · answer #8 · answered by smitty 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋