If the average human lifespan was increased to 200 years, how many people would be on Earth in 100 years?

Answer 1

Probably not as many as there are now, because we're already outrunning our resources. Some would live to be 200 but most would starve or be killed in wars over water and food.

The intelligent solution is to provide life extension for free (imagine the uproar if it wasn't done that way), but on the strict condition that whoever gets it will be irreversibly sterilized. However, humanity being the sad mixture of irrationality and cleverness that it is, we will no doubt solve it the old-fashioned way by slaughtering each other instead.

Answer 2

ok first each and every new child has heard of the human centipede lots of say that they've watched it whilst they have been given freaked by employing the trailer. it is not proper for a new child of 10 it incredibly is an 18 for a reason. And it ought to impact your youngster's psychological wellness state and progression greater beneficial than you could think of. i does no longer propose all and sundry watch it no longer to show a 10 3 hundred and sixty 5 days old

Answer 3

How smart Do you think the N.S.A is 200 years ago dirt floors!?
How smart Do you think the N.S.A is 200 years ago dirt floors!
do they not think a higher inetllgnece that made the billions of computational d.n.a that they have found on this planet and yet what they are doing know There are knows knowns and unknows and they have taken all technolgy away 1950 never happen!!!!
www.beyond-science.com www.beyond-science.net

Answer 4

i would guess about 35 billion people with the rate we have increased in the past century, along with all of the current people who would have died, that sounds like a good estimate

Answer 5

too many!!!billions of people ithink so.and that time mostly of basic needs is not enough.

Answer 6

tooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo many
you look like spock too

Answer 7

way too many!