2007-01-01 06:47:35 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It is a fair question. I think he has lost a lot of Republican support by not shoring up our borders.
Republicans are mindful of our national identity as a key element of our national strength whereas Democrats seem to welcome the 'multiculturalism' that allows a foreign population to simply walk in and take over.
If we want the border issue fixed correctly, it will likely be another Republican or a Libertarian who would be our best option.
2007-01-01 06:50:21 · answer #1 · answered by speakeasy 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Despite the Media spin job about it being Iraq, I ousted the traitors for just that reason!
I forget exactly which year it was and the exact number, but I believe it was 4 or 5 employers were fined in all of 2005!
Talk about a bad joke on the people of this country!
Fine the damn employers, shut down the Day Labor Assemblies, throw any city official who declares their city a sanctuary in the deepest darkest prison we have and take control damn it!
We are starting to get very, very angry as we lose our jobs and wages and social services and hospitals ETC. ETC.!!!!
2007-01-01 07:00:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Who cares? The democrats will also allow all of these illegals to do whatever, they want their votes just like the republicans. Now doesn't that make you feel all warm and cozy that both parties are willing to let ILLEGAL ALIENS vote as to how and who is going to run our country. We are being sold down the tubes by both parties. Write your new representatives in Congress and let them know, NO AMNESTY of any form.
2007-01-01 06:59:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He probably lost a lot (including me), but I know for a fact the Dems wont do any better about the illegal immigration epidemic.
2007-01-01 06:50:47 · answer #4 · answered by BORED AT WORK 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I am still behind the President but I would admire him a lot more if I saw a fence or wall going up on our southern boarder.
I would congratulate and applaud any politician that led the movement to physically secure our southern boarder.
2007-01-01 06:59:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's hard to tell what his immigration policy is.
I did notice that three of his brothers and his Nephew Prescott III married Mexican women from the wealthiest families in Mexico.
Go big Red Go
2007-01-01 06:55:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Just look at the election results of November 2006.
2007-01-01 06:51:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
he's lost my support all because he doesn't want to **** off his little brother who married a Hispanic woman, which is BS! i don't know if she got here legally, or not, i could give 2 sh its. what matters is that the worthless Mexicans are coming into our country illegally, taking our jobs, and mooching of our government for assistance, and bush wants to grant them amnesty? BS!!! i will NEVER vote for a libtard, I'd kill myself before doing that. It takes someone without morals, or a soul to vote for a libtard. i myself have decided not to vote, thanks to crooked politicians on both sides of the aisle.
2007-01-01 07:01:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
reality is immigrants are mandatory for the jobs others do no favor to settle for, a lack of them has led to many smaller organizations depending upon them to fold. a minimum of they're prepared to artwork make contributions to the commercial device and are not on welfare utilizing up our troublesome earned tax funds..human beings desire a danger.america change into equipped on immigrants,and could proceed to desire them to stimulate our economic device.
2016-12-01 09:52:16 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
probably a lot. but republicans differ on immigration. some like his work voucher program while I think most would like to have a giant fence built along the border. its sounds like it would work to me?
2007-01-01 06:51:24 · answer #10 · answered by bored_and loving it 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋