English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

Out of all the countries in the world, George Bush is the one who's keeping the country more stable even if there's a war going on. I don't personally like him but he's better than the rest of the world leaders. I gotta hand it to him.

2007-01-01 07:49:39 · answer #1 · answered by ♀VANshee 7 · 0 0

I am not sure that there are any whom I would consider great, but if I had to choose, I would say G W Bush and Tony Blair. Both make decisions based upon what they feel is right, regardless of public opinion or the easy way out. A good leader should not need to take a poll before he decides what needs to be done.

2007-01-01 07:52:35 · answer #2 · answered by Flyby 6 · 0 0

In this age of KALIYUGA -the era of dissolution-a highly dictatorial and genocide expert will be a suitable one to that post. He can manage to control the alarming rate of the present population growth of the nations effectively by killing people of both attacked and attacking countries. The HIV will also be assisting him for it.There are a good number including Bush,fit to be voted for the post.

2007-01-01 09:21:57 · answer #3 · answered by venu 3 · 0 0

Al Gore.

And Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

2007-01-01 07:07:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

It wouldn't be smart to have one leader, because they're not going to be 100% correct and we've got to have a choice in where we want to live, and how it should be run.

But if it was just one, it should be Hillary.

2007-01-01 06:48:10 · answer #5 · answered by Kacky 7 · 0 1

honestly, I think Bush would win that. I can't think of any other great leaders.

2007-01-01 06:42:37 · answer #6 · answered by Squawkers 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers