2007-01-01 06:22:50 · 9 answers · asked by v_mann79 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
It took a good film and mired it in silliness and bizarre attitudes
2007-01-01 06:29:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The first film was great in terms of character depiction. The sequels were unnecessary with a messy plot that relied too much on CGI.
2007-01-01 15:58:32 · answer #2 · answered by starchilde5 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, the first one is of course the best, but what made the other bad is the special effects. It´s like there was a competition who could put most special FX into one movie
2007-01-01 14:31:37 · answer #3 · answered by brudzchy 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
are you sure because the three prequals to the starwars trilogy are even more disliked. also probably because neo dies
2007-01-01 14:27:30 · answer #4 · answered by guyver4 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They made even less sense than the first one...
2007-01-01 14:30:55 · answer #5 · answered by Jon W 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
cuz they didnt even compare to the original
2007-01-01 17:41:50 · answer #6 · answered by muzit 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
cause they are hokie,,, not as good as the original,,,seemed rushed to be put on the screen
2007-01-01 14:26:08 · answer #7 · answered by cmhurley64 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because it gets old quick!
2007-01-01 14:28:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
they were just terrible....
2007-01-01 14:34:08 · answer #9 · answered by zakk 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋