Why Do Liberals Feel There Is No Terrorist Threat?

Question

Is it because they believe Michael Moore knows better, or is it because they admire Europe`s strong stance against islam`s war against the west ? What do you think ?

Answer 1

I think its called Pot

Answer 2

I think they should say "Mission Accomplished" and make it official that they believe (or profess to believe) either:

1. that, yes, there was a threat but that it has been successfully neutralized and we can now stand down; or

2. that, no there never was a real, externally-based threat, even to the point of asserting that our own government planned and executed 9/11, but that we have in fact created a threat with our overreaction and misdirected reaction to 9/11, and that therefore we should stand down as a symbol of our good faith and in order to allow the threat that we ourselves created to abate.

Then we'll see if they can take some of the derision they've been handing out.

Answer 3

I think Liberals know that fools will keep posting dumb questions no matter what they do.Liberals do not want to go back to the Good Old Days people were killed because they wanted control of they own land.I like to see the L word tossed around.The terrorist are a threat you know it and the liberals know it.

Answer 4

I'm a liberal and every statement you've made is totally false and very silly.

Read more than the headlines and you'll reach the same conclusion.

That's what I think.

Answer 5

It's because they don't want to get anyone mad, so they try to ignore the bad in everyone. Which is stupid. You'll never make everyone happy and when you're dealing with evil, you need to defeat it, not join forces with it, or worse, be indecisive about what to do or think.

Answer 6

You mean the threat from Washington DC?

Answer 7

They prefer to bury their heads in the sand and let someone else take care of them.

Answer 8

they don't. however the threat of terrorism is nothing compared with the threat of global warming. they just have their priorities right.

Answer 9

Great question! Contrary to what you hear in the government-controlled media, there is no terror (beyond the usual region-specific revolutionary type that's always existed). 9/11 was orchestrated by the U.S. and Israel (see scholarsfor911truth.org/), but for different reasons. The U.S. will begin building a NAFTA Superhighway next year that stretches from the S. Texas Mexican border through the Midwest up to Canada for the purpose of facilitating a North American Union parallel to the European Union (see Congressman Ron Paul's website). The Christian West recognizes through the revelations in Samual P. Huntington's book, "Clash of Civilizations" that they will never get the Muslim world to accept this one world globalization, so we need to create pretexts for wars against the Muslims. 9/11 was made possible by carrying out 15 different "war games" by the military simultaneously and at the same location of the "attacks". Same thing in london on 7/7 (again, see scholarsfor911truth.org/). The British authorities were carrying out "anti-terrorism" exercises at the exact same time and location as the bombings. The Indonesian authorities have investigated the Bali bombing and the trail leads to the U.S. military (Guardian October 27, 2002). Same thing with the Spain train bombing. The U.S. military pays "contracters" $30,000 per month (per Melissa Rossi, "What every American should know about who runs the World), to carry out "military operations". Have you heard any more about the anthrax letters since the Baltimore Sun reported that the very unique weapons grade used was traced to a U.S. military lab? (There's a Patriot Act to pass, we can't have dissenters in congress.) So the war on terror is a fabrication to minimize the muslim numbers and establish puppet presidents in Muslim countries. The masses mostly consist of simple people who are very easy to fool. The U.S. Intelligence agencies specialize in false flag attacks and influencing elections in foreign countries through clever propaganda. (Our intelligence agencies were not born yesterday and there is no organization better at deception-have you any idea how many false films they've produced, including Flight 93?).The press is the key. But the U.S. cannot control the foreign press, so stories like the following are written and linked to the internet: "Hijack 'suspects' alive and well" by BBC News on September 23, 2001; "Gore Vidal claims 'Bush junta' complicit in 9/11 by the Guardian Observer on October 27, 2002". There are hundreds more, including an interview with Osama soon after 9/11 where he explains that he had no involvement with 9/11 and why. (The December, 2001 "confession" video has been proven a fraud-more propaganda by CIA/Mossad). Everything was fabricated (cell phones did not work at 30,000 feet in 2001, and if Marc Bingham did call his mom, he wouldn't say, "hi mom, this is Marc Bingham". But the masses are very easy to fool. Show an explosion and TELL them what happened and they buy it hook, line and sinker. By the way, skyscrapers do not collapse by fire. During WWII a B-52 bomber flew into the Empire State Building. It burned for awhile but these building are built to withstand multiple airplane hits, as attested by the WTC construction mgr, Frank Demartini on the History Channel. And when you do a "review" of the call on the field by revisiting the "attack" you can see that instead of burning down, the towers were getting blown to kingdom come with explosives, the very thing that the witnesses attest to in the dvd's and the internet videos. Now you know why Bush resisted an investigation (which he later loaded with insiders who wrote the biggest lie since Santa Clause). Now you know why Bush refused to testify under oath. Now you know why Bush insisted that Cheney be at his side during his interview. Now you know why 9/11 is not among the crimes listed on the FBI website of Osama Bin Laden. Now you know why no one was reprimanded or fired for allowing 9/11 to happen. Now you know why the Patriot Act was on Ashcroft's desk on September 10, 2001. Now you know why most of the Bush gang with any sintilla of a concious has "resigned", such as General Tommy Franks, Karen Hughes, Colin Powell, and scores of others. Franks is quoted in Senator Bob Graham's book, "Intelligence Matters" as saying "This is not a war on terror". Indeed it isn't Mr. Franks. Now you know why Pat Tillman was killed by "friendly fire" after he became outspoken on how bogus the war was (as reported in Sports Ilustrated Magazine). Again, there is no war on terror. The U.S. needs a significant military presence in Eurasia to stifle any challenge to its global supremacy. Pat Tillman did not appreciate giving up his NFL career to be the oil police. But that is what our military is doing in Afghanistan. Do you really believe that a bunch of rag tag towel heads with no air force, no navy, no cruise missles, no helicopters, no uniforms, no canteens, no nothing can hold off and resurge against the world's sole global superpower???? Remember the Gulf War in 1991? How long did it take the U.S. to remove the fourth largest army in the world from Kuwait? TWO MONTHS!!!!!!!!!!!! And FIVE YEARS later, we're losing the "war" in Afghanistan? Yeah, right. Now you know why the U.S. government refuses to answer the dozens of questions of the families of the 9/11 victims as shown in the dvd, Press for Truth. Now you know why the 9/11 Truth Movement reps are yelled at and discredited with name calling in the mainstream media. You people need to decide if you are sheep or your own thinker. Your government is decieving you to your grave and you just keep sleeping. I know, I know, our government would not do such a thing. Google "Operation Northwoods" and your political naivete will lump up in your shorts. The 9/11 attack was actually drawn up in 1962 as a hit on Cuba, intentionally kiliing Americans. It was to be blamed on Castro so we could remove him militarily. Kennedy, the peacemaker, rejected it and the plan has been sitting on the shelf waiting for the Neoconservative establishment to revive it, only at a different location. As Zbig Brzezinski wrote in "The Global Chessboard", "...it is more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstances OF A TRULY MASSIVE AND WIDELY PERCEIVED DIRECT EXTERNAL THREAT." Guess what 9/11 was folks? It was a TRULY MASSIVE AND WIDELY PERCEIVED DIRECT EXTERNAL THREAT! Yeah, create an explosion and TELL the people what they saw and...lets roll...

Stay informed. Get your news from the internet, dvd's, and the international press. And inform others. This is our country. Eventually...we will tell...Bush..

Answer 10

they are right, in sofar that all terrorist are currently fighting in Iraq and afghanistan