George w bush because he wasn't genuinely elected
2007-01-01 08:45:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
There are many many in power...Here is a list of the 10 WORST rated by Parade...
1) Omar al-Bashir, Sudan.
2) Kim Jong-il, North Korea.
3) Than Shwe, Burma (Myanmar).
4) Robert Mugabe, Zimbabwe.
5) Islam Karimov, Uzbekistan.
6) Hu Jintao, China.
7) King Abdullah, Saudi Arabia.
8) Saparmurat Niyazov, Turkmenistan.
9) Seyed Ali Khamane’i, Iran.
10) Teodoro Obiang Nguema, Equatorial Guinea.
2007-01-01 06:18:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mystyria xMYQx 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Pakistan,Almost all the countries in central Asia,Libya,Syria,Burma are ruled by Dictators,Many countries like Indonesia Thailand Egypt are semi dictatorships,Monarchy's like Saudi Arabia,Kuwait can be considered dictatorships too.Mr.Putin and Pres.Bush have the tendency to act like dictators.Not to forget North Korea and some countries in Africa like sudan and others
2007-01-01 06:19:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dr.O 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Here is a list of National dicatators in 2006. The list includes 42 current dictators.
http://arthuredelstein.org/worlddictators/
2007-01-01 06:17:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Kwan Kong 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Lukashenka in Belarus
Kim Jong Il in North Korea
Velez in Columbia
Shwe in Myanmar
Karimov in Uzbekistan
Mugabe in Zimbabwe
Abdullah in Saudi Arabia
al-Khalifah in Bahrain
al-Qaddafi in Libya
to name a few
Niyazov in Turkmenistan died a couple weeks ago.
2007-01-01 06:19:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by sudonym x 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hugo Chavez in Venezuala
Kim Jong il in North Korea
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in Iran
Bashar al-Assad in Syria
Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe
2007-01-01 06:13:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Vincent 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
George Bush - America (and the world)
Tony Blair - UK (OK well maybe not running the country just running after Bush)
And well with these two still in power i don't think that any other countries get a say. After all if America don't agree with another country they go to war with them.
2007-01-01 06:15:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Wow your end on the end results of an invasion baffle. inspite of the indisputable fact that you in all likelihood characterize how little about something of the global US human beings understand. enable me ask you some question ar Afghanistan and Iraq wealthy and effective international places now? they don't invade the international places you element out because they don't look to be as god-forsaken to the eyes of the global community as Afghanistan or Iraq were. many of the oil coming from Venezuela is going to US refineries. you may want to assume some sort of retaliation from Venezuela like bombing the extraction web content. besides, invading an American democratic usa might want to carry consequences because, like it or not, there are different international places and governments contained in the global and also you nevertheless ought to fake to care about them, like you've been. you'd be destroyed and extra for your knees for your vanity and also you pest-like behaviour it truly is ruining the planet. in all likelihood China will try this. this is unhappy because a tyrant would get replaced by yet another tyrant. And there you've your answer. North Korea has sturdy ties with China. it truly is why this is not invaded. As regards Cuba, nicely, you look to have missed some historic previous training. try the Cuban missile disaster web page on a historic previous e book, i might want to assert. Now, Iran is complete of loopy human beings. They in all likelihood have some nuclear and/or organic and organic guns and their infantrymen might want to be prepared to commence a kamikaze warfare. besides, attack Iran and each of the Arab league will bypass hostile to you which will really destroy your economic device, considering maximum of your oil comes from them. Oh and attack a usa like Venezuela and bye bye food furnish. wager the position your low-cost bananas comes from.
2016-12-01 09:49:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think he's running Cuba anymore - but he'd probably do a better job of running Britain or the States than Blair or Bush.
2007-01-01 06:09:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
President Bush?
2007-01-01 06:24:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋