2007-01-01 05:55:11 · 13 answers · asked by SemSem 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Iran is a terrorist state that has proclaimed that it wishes to destroy Israel. Nuclear weapons would give them the opportunity to do so, heaven forfend.
If Israel does indeed have a nuclear capability, it will use it only as a last resort, after a first strike by some other power.
Iran is the biggest threat to the West today, and their military capability must be curbed by the West.
In addition, individual terrorists must be eliminated--if necessary by engaging them and killing them.
There can be no rational argument against this two-pronged approach.
2007-01-02 17:12:06 · answer #1 · answered by Ivri_Anokhi 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Good question. It's hard not to say the USA considering the new steps toward allowing genetically altered foods, now cloned beef along with already altered vegetables like corn, and who knows the long term effects that will have. New and exciting diseases, probably. I think places like India and Pakistan, who pave roads and build schools with materials irradiated from nuclear waste will bring about widespread blood diseases and cancer in that part of the world. This isn't the atomic bomb scenario but I, personally, think we'll poison ourselves long before nuclear weapons kill us off.
Pollution is running amok, just look at the way cars get bigger and bigger, pumping out more and more carbon monoxide, despite the higher gasoline prices. (It always blew my mind how the greedy, selfish and wasteful brainwashed people in this country to buy the big car since you look SO important. YOU can afford it.) Meanwhile, we invade Iraq to free the people? Oh, no. We need those oil fields, or at least the control of them because we need that gas to fuel our big cars, don't we? We need more pollution , too.
I think the division between people that actually want the human race to continue and those that want to be IMPORTANT in their lifetimes is so immense that global catastrophe will be the only thing to stop this big, terrible snowball.
2007-01-01 14:15:53 · answer #2 · answered by heartmindspace 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
America. I feel so bad saying that, But that's the truth. We always like to interfere and threat. I dont think if we don't show any aggression to Iran or any other country, which are having nuclear weapons.. they won't damage anyone. As, its common sense that they don't have enough power and money to waste for no reason.
rohan I can see u an Indian.. the rotten one! I believe Pakistan doesnt have much power or sources to make the world enveloped in insecurity.
Lets talk logic here, at least u can try.
2007-01-01 14:21:18 · answer #3 · answered by Purplish 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Definitely America. America has every deadly weapon.. but doesn't allow others to have some. America even doesn't respect what UN says. The way usama was encouraged against Russia... now he is considered to be a terrorist.
The way America treats middle east, that is what making and creating unrest all around the world. Otherwise it was never like that b4.
But I won't blame America... people r nice and friendly... its the administration that is not representing the country wisely and the way they want.
2007-01-01 14:08:10 · answer #4 · answered by ManhattanGirl 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The United States of America.
The only country to nuke another, the only country to invade another in the last 25 years, the one that is lead by a chimp with an itchy trigger finger.
2007-01-01 14:05:04 · answer #5 · answered by Perry L 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
My country U.S.A?? Uhm, I can go out to the streets and it's pretty safe so I don't know what all you mean by saying America is a dangerous country! I'm really safe right where I am. You want dangerous, try North Korea! Try Iraq in itself! It's been bombed every day since March 2003! Try Israel and Lebanon-a buncha countries in the middleast. Try Colombia! Them guerrilleros go out and "clean" the streets, kill people everyday! Now tell me U.S. is a dangerous country!
2007-01-01 15:23:43 · answer #6 · answered by ♀VANshee 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
I say it's a flatout tie between Iran and North Korea and which one will provide nukes to terrorists.
2007-01-01 14:37:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I don't think that the most dangerous is a state...... I think it's an organization......... it's "Zionism". I believe that the Zionist lobby is controlling USA and Israel.
2007-01-02 10:53:27 · answer #8 · answered by MagicWand 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Iran and north korea.
2007-01-01 21:18:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
the US. Bush Will go to war anytime with anybody, and will lie about the reasons so he can do it
2007-01-01 14:42:23 · answer #10 · answered by jeremy B 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋