English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What makes a leader...with your definition, why was Hitler a bad leader?

2007-01-01 05:51:33 · 17 answers · asked by Lina 4 in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

17 answers

A bad leader is one who does not help the people that he/she is in charge of. A leader's responsibility is to protect his/her people and keep the nation/city/whatever prosperous so that the people can lead a worthwhile existence.

Adolf Hitler was a bad leader because he persecuted the people who did not cater to what he himself wanted from them and took Germany's value for himself.

2007-01-01 05:56:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Please get your facts straight.Hitler was an amazing leader.He just had the wrong Idea of how the world should be.Hitler brought Germany out of the depression and untied a country.He was very charismatic and he led hundreds of thousands of men.The only reason you say he was a bad leader is because of what motivated him.I have studied world war 2 alot, I know what I'm talking about.I don't personally believe that what he did was right nor do I feel Superior because I'm white I just know what history has taught me and it has taught me that Hitler was a great leader.Just a sh*tty human being.Kim IL Jong is a great leader just a little crazy.unfortunately most great leaders are a little crazy.

2007-01-01 06:03:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

A bad leader IS Hitler. My God, look at the Holocaust! It scares me that you have to ask WHY Hitler was a bad leader!

2007-01-01 05:53:12 · answer #3 · answered by Waffle! 3 · 1 1

Hitler was not bad leader- though his ideas were terrible, thousands of people followed him, which means that he was great leader- but horrible person.

2007-01-01 05:58:36 · answer #4 · answered by Sali 3 · 0 0

The only reason Hitler got what he wanted accomplished was that he took advantage of a depleted and broken down country. After WWI, Germany was so poor that they would get behind anyone who would get them to the "promise land." They needed someone to restore pride in Germany. So Hitler was just at the right place at the right time. Oh yeah, he was a homo too!

2007-01-01 05:57:22 · answer #5 · answered by Greg 3 · 0 1

A good leader is for the "people" who voted him in.
Bush and Hitler are in the same category.
They ARENT leaders!

2007-01-01 05:54:58 · answer #6 · answered by brock 7 · 2 1

You are just basing George Bush on Cancer now what about Julius Caesar made the roman republic the roman empire. Edmund Hillary first man to reach the summit of Mt.Everest Dalai Lama Nelson Mandela Calvin Coolidge John Quincy Adams Henry the VIII Overall the Cardinal signs: Aries, Cancer, Libra, Capricorn

2016-05-23 03:20:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

well hitler was a great leader! its just that he used it for bad and not good thats all. i think that makes a good leader is cunning, will power, honnesty, compatiblity, and a good personality willing to listen to ideas, and all the good stuff like that

2007-01-01 05:59:30 · answer #8 · answered by *Living a {{ღяøM@N!Cღ}} Tragity* 5 · 0 0

Hitler was bad in that he took his country to war and decided who was fit to live in "his" society.

One reason the Americans did so well is that they had no qualms in putting women into the workforce. Hitler never allowed that

2007-01-01 06:08:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hilter is the worlds worst leader ever. One thing that he did, he killed almost all the innocent jews because he hated them, not because they did something bad. He put them in concentration camps and starved them and burned them and lots more. its a scary part of history

2007-01-01 06:25:02 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers