The theory of natural motion reexamines the fundamental nature of the classical principles of uniform motion and acceleration. Specifically, it focuses on the area of physics commonly referred to as Newtonian mechanics as defined by Newton’s three laws of motion. Among the surprising findings are these: Uniform motion is not something an object does, but rather, a state that an object is in relative to other objects. And it is seen that this state is not only indistinguishable from, but in fact the same state as a state of rest. From this, it follows that acceleration is not actually a form of motion at all, but rather a force induced change of this motion state. In conclusion it is argued that Newton’s Laws of motion are not entirely correct even at the classical none relativistic level and thus require modification even at this level before such principles can be explored on the relativistic scale.
2007-01-01 05:56:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Steve A 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The theory of natural motion reexamines the fundamental nature of the classical principles of uniform motion and acceleration. Specifically, it focuses on the area of physics commonly referred to as Newtonian mechanics as defined by Newton’s three laws of motion. Among the surprising findings are these: Uniform motion is not something an object does, but rather, a state that an object is in relative to other objects. And it is seen that this state is not only indistinguishable from, but in fact the same state as a state of rest. From this, it follows that acceleration is not actually a form of motion at all, but rather a force induced change of this motion state. In conclusion it is argued that Newton’s Laws of motion are not entirely correct even at the classical none relativistic level and thus require modification even at this level before such principles can be explored on the relativistic scale
its too exaustive to cite here
2007-01-02 02:20:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by veerabhadrasarma m 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The theory of natural motion reexamines the fundamental nature of the classical principles of uniform motion and acceleration. Specifically, it focuses on the area of physics commonly referred to as Newtonian mechanics as defined by Newton’s three laws of motion. Among the surprising findings are these: Uniform motion is not something an object does, but rather, a state that an object is in relative to other objects. And it is seen that this state is not only indistinguishable from, but in fact the same state as a state of rest. From this, it follows that acceleration is not actually a form of motion at all, but rather a force induced change of this motion state. In conclusion it is argued that Newton’s Laws of motion are not entirely correct even at the classical none relativistic level and thus require modification even at this level before such principles can be explored on the relativistic scale.
For further information visit -
http://www.mrelativity.net/NMotion/NaturalMotion.htm
2007-01-01 15:11:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by Glam Girl 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
in step with threat you ought to study Darwin extra heavily. Darwin did no longer see a conflict between God's plan and the assumption of organic determination. in certainty, maximum theologians and scientists can agree on extremely some the information presented in evolutionary study. i think of in case you stepped back from the dogma you have been taught, and theory-approximately your very own wisdom of God based on each and every thing you comprehend and characteristic stated, then you definately could possibly locate the respond with out asking others. i think of we are able to agree that the quest for God is an all eating experience for the time of existence, and that our perfect wisdom won't even come close. If somebody tells you definitively that one part or the different in this debate is sweet or incorrect, i think of you're able to desire to ask them to tutor it. Neither part can tutor or disprove the plan of God or the presence of organic determination absent God. As with maximum issues, in component of certainty probable someplace interior the middle.
2016-11-25 20:19:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The answer is found in the overall frequency of a moving object. As a mass moves, energy in form of frequency increases in direction of travel. This frequency increase is converted at right angles to that of direction of travel. Mass at "rest" is able to have energy move in any direction at "c". As a mass accelerates toward the speed of light this value changes; energy is unable to move at right angles as quickly. At the speed of light, energy movement at right angles to direction of travel would become zero.
Accelerating mass has energy change occur within according to that of electromagnetic energy "E = hf". This is because mass is composed of this form of energy.
http://360.yahoo.com/noddarc "The Problem and Repair of Relativity" would be of interest.
2007-01-03 07:48:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋