Loose Change? Or do you believe what Bush said?

Question

To Daz2020? Did I say that I believed in Loose Change? I said neither! If you don't have a more interesting answer, you don't have to answer it.

Answer 1

Many believe due to the repeated success of the "big lie" throughout recent history. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Lie
It has worked so many times because of its ingenious premise. Most of us cannot believe it to be possible to do this, so we fall for it every time.

Answer 2

As a researcher myself, I would have to say loose change is a good documentary, while it gave some very basic truths and poses excellent questions for further inquiry, it presented a discriminating flaw in that:

1. Too many eyewitnesses saw a 757 hit the pentagon
2. Flight 93, was obviously shot down by a fighter plan,
corroborated by the implied statement of secretary of transportation norman minetta.

That said, I do however think loose change should make a third documentary, one investigating the benefactors to 9-11, the blocked investigations into osama bin laden prior to 9/11, the history of bush-saudi bin ladin group in mutual financial benefits (I am not insinuating anything here, just a question), the reported CIA agents who were imprissoned/ hampered when they went forward with the knowledge of 9/11 prior to the event, the meeting of cheney with enron/ oil companies, just prior to 9/11 and more information on eye witness accounts on the state of the WTC 7 and twin towers prior to the collapse. I would investigate why the 36 hour power outage on the weekend in the WTC tower, what that was all about , and corroborate forbes statements that he saw many strange engineers with cables, and tools entering the towers on the weekend prior to 9/11.

I would investigate, what these engineers were doing there in the dark, were they installing internet cable as implied, restoring power, and how they got the keys to the manual locks throughout the building.

I would investigate in detail, from the WTC blue prints, speak to the engineers who designed the building, and theorize exactly how long it would take to rig the demolition to take down the tower in perfect free fall and how many explosives it would require. I would investigate the floors on which the squibs emerged from the building, what was on those floors, were they vacant, and who had access to those floors.

More information about the removal of the bomb sniffing dogs, needs to be investigated six days prior to the attack, why were they removed, who ordered the removal.

There are so many things left unexplained, they did do a good job though on the preface that planned terrorist attacks is by no means new for a government as a pretext for war.

I am still on the fence about this, I do not think the president was in on this, but further investigations are definately needed to find out who was. Maybe the government is protecting some of its wealthiest citizens, who knows.

Answer 3

theres nothing to beleive in, loose change all they do is point out the mass of facts , they point out the hundreds of blatant fukinn lies and they ask hundreds of questions that our governments are not answering and the news corpoartion controled media is not covering properly or not at all . ITS ALL IN PLAIN VIEW .

heres what i did sat down with a piece of paper and a pen and wrote down what i didnt agree with then did quite a bit of research on these subjects and couldnt disprove them .even though from the overview of the film and common sence from what was shown its odviuos this was an inside job yet took a couple of days to sink in . this is not even a case of it doesnt add up , its proven .

youve watched loose change now watch this and see why this has been done http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=786048453686176230&q=terrorstorm

i havent read the answers to this question yet but i imagine most will be negative from ignorant zombies ,people who just havent got a clue and others who realise what is happening and are just sticking there heads in the sand .

any way from all ive written its important to not except everything your told and to do your own digging , laters.

Answer 4

While I don't believe that Bush orchestrated the attacks on 9/11, I also have doubts about the official story. The government line really does have some problems with it, and there are unanswered questions.

Questioning is not the same thing as theorizing.

Answer 5

I don't believe anything that Bush says, but there isn't much i can believe that's in Loose Change although it's a great science fiction movie.

Answer 6

It's not a matter of believing Bush or not its a matter of reality vs fantasy. By the way, why do you think people that believe Bush are foolish but you blindly accept what a couple of film producers have to say? Hmmmmm

Additional Info: Then why phrase it the way you did? Your question implies Bush's credibility or support of him equates to a particular version of what happened on 9/11. It does not. There is simply the reality that 9/11 was perpetrated solely by Al Quida. My comments are not directed at you in particular but all foolish "non-believers."

Answer 7

Loose Change? Loose marbles more like it.

Answer 8

i believe Bush

Answer 9

I believe what I saw.

Answer 10

Propaganda used to bring our morale down lower.