To get the job done in Iraq does it mean to kill more ppl there?

Question

Rich, why are you still here?

Yes, to get the job done is a good thing especially when it is not you does it

Answer 1

You need to ask the terrorists who will not allow an elected governm,ent to govern

abc

Answer 2

If that is what it takes, than so be it. Trying to fight a half-hearted war is worse than surrender in my opinion.

I want sufficient troops needed to absolutely obliterate any opposition. To make it known that to go against this war will hurt you. It's time to stop playing, time to take the gloves off and do this the way it is meant to be done. People die during times of war. It's a fact. The trick is to go in and use overwhelming firepower and numbers to crush your enemy until they cannot get up again. Fast and certain.

Answer 3

Absolutely. That is our policy and BushCo says it will be carried out. Dead Iraqis are only "collateral damage" to their plans, and don't matter in the larger plan for Dominion in the Middle East and the plunder that goes with it. They have a "different" set of morals and ethics from the rest of us, and concern for human life is either extremely low on the list or non-existent.

Answer 4

That depends entirely on the minority of Islamic radicals and their continuing efforts to prevent the Iraqi people from moving into the 21st century.

Answer 5

if thats what it takes...most of these squemish people complaining about deaths in iraq seem to forget that in america after our own civil war was finished there were killings in the south up until the 1960's by people who disagreed that america was one country...same as in iraq...

Answer 6

Insurgents and terrorists.

Answer 7

Go read http://www.cuttingedge.org/news/n2118.cfm

then you decide.

Answer 8

~Who knows? Not even the president knows.~

Answer 9

thats why US army is there!