I believe that the execution was wrong. How can another country interfere in the matters of Iraq and take power on context of promoting democracy? What right does George Bush or any other human being have so as to decide the fate of another person? Another view is that George Bush had a personal grudge with Saddam Hussain as he had tried to kill off his father, so Bush wanted to take revenge. Isn't this exploitation of power that Bush has? We need to think deeply into this matter....
2007-01-01 04:13:19 · 9 answers · asked by Siddhartha 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He killed hundreds of thousands. Would the execution of Hitler have been justified?
abc
2007-01-05 01:49:04 · answer #1 · answered by Bill G 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sure. He became a dictator who killed lots of folk, including women folk and young little ones. offering them very almost not something yet soreness and suffering. He additionally began lots of wars with different worldwide places. so which you spot? Saddam's execution became justified.
2016-10-19 07:48:39 · answer #2 · answered by ashworth 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is amazing how many ignorant people there are in this country. Saddam was a mass murderer who was tried by an Iraqi court, with Iraqi attorneys and an Iraqi jury. He was found guilty of his crimes and he was sentenced by an Iraqi judge to die for his crimes. He was hung by Iraqis and buried by Iraqis. How can you not believe that the good people of Iraq did not hate this man who had murdered innocent people for 30 years and plundered their wealth? President Bush had nothing to do with it other than capturing him and freeing the country to be governed by normal law abiding people. I can't understand what goes on inside the head of people like you.
2007-01-01 04:20:45 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes, obviously 'B. of Baghdad', how dramatic, go watch CNN
here's my satiric repsonse to what I figure is a rather obvious question
so, yes. ahem...because the country that executed him was not his own, but one that armed him as an ally with chemical weapons and supported him during the Iran-Iraq war
...so, an american war tribunal convicted him on killing over 150 Kurds, whereas America has caused more death and destruction than he ever did in the past few years. The devil they knew was much better than the devil they now know.
2007-01-01 04:17:36 · answer #4 · answered by Happier in China 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
"What right does George Bush or any other human being have so as to decide the fate of another person?"
What right did Sadam Hussein have so as to decide the deaths of thousands of Iraqi people?
2007-01-01 05:31:29 · answer #5 · answered by kangtalvr 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes. he was the "Butcher of Baghdad" responsible for the murder of hundreds of thousands. He is currently burning in Hell for eternity.
2007-01-01 04:16:54 · answer #6 · answered by googol_1_0_0 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋
He was not excuted. It was his double. This will be proven. The evidence is already available.
2007-01-01 05:48:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
would it have been more justified if someone had assasinated him and then his henchmen had gassed their entire area for revenge..???
2007-01-01 04:18:08 · answer #8 · answered by badjanssen 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Please see CajunBilly's answer above. Your question is ignorant.
2007-01-01 04:30:17 · answer #9 · answered by Chicken Jones 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋