English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

Of course I would. I have a microchip in my dog, what's the difference?

But then I think they should put one in child molesters as well and track them at all times, keeping them away from our innocent children!! But that's just my opinion and unfortunately I don't get paid enough to make the important decisions. We'll leave that to our "wonderful government".

2007-01-01 03:10:34 · answer #1 · answered by soonerbelle71 2 · 2 0

That's a tough question because of the question about later in life? As a parent, wouldn't it be so tempting to just check on them all the time and not give them any privacy or freedom? I mean, I'm all for a way of figuring out where you child would be if they were kidnapped. That's a scary scary thing. But it would be so tempting to misuse it to try to make sure your teenager isn't getting into trouble when the fact is the more a teen is kept on a leash, the more likely he or she is going to go on to do bad things.

Meridianhawk42, great movie idea. I'd back you.

2007-01-01 03:30:42 · answer #2 · answered by J-Dawn 7 · 0 0

Face is the area that concerns because this is the area you specifically ought to attend to all day- an accepted body might want to suffice. I look to savor a strong body too, yet specifically in a "yeah i might want to shag her" kinda way. Face remains what extremely counts once you're thinking something extreme. inspite of the indisputable fact that, a lower than accepted body is in no way strong. One's defecit is made up for by personality at that element. An unattractive body might want to be someone who's quite out of form, disproportionate, has undesirable epidermis, etc. i do not supply extreme priority to boobs or butts, besides the actual incontrovertible truth that both or both are strong (ideally the latter in my own opinion lol)

2016-12-01 09:42:38 · answer #3 · answered by endicott 4 · 0 0

Sure. Then I'd write a movie about my kid all grown up being tracked by the evil new world order. I'd call it "Embedded".

Seriously, I see pros and cons with this situation, but if it helps save my kid's life and I could be sure that it wasn't being used in the wrong way I would probably go for it.

2007-01-01 03:09:26 · answer #4 · answered by Meridianhawk42 3 · 2 0

Hmmmmmm........ I think yes from a safety point of view, but you never know what the government would do with such a powerful tool - Big Brother will be watching you! There's already so much resistance against ID cards, can you imagine the uproar this would cause?!

2007-01-01 03:11:45 · answer #5 · answered by PT 4 · 2 0

No I wouldn't because there aren't too many newborns being kidnapped these days!

2007-01-01 03:09:29 · answer #6 · answered by IT'S JUST ME ! 7 · 0 1

Yes. But I wouldn't tell the kid that I had that done, and that way, I'd track where he was as he got older too.

2007-01-01 03:06:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes I would. I think that everyone needs a chip.

2007-01-01 03:08:51 · answer #8 · answered by Gone fishin' 7 · 0 0

at first, thought no way, but , it should be put in older people that are declining in the mind, animals have had this for years,

2007-01-01 03:12:04 · answer #9 · answered by ? 7 · 0 0

Yes & they need to do that to elderly dementia / alheimers people.
Animals have had it for years I think we need to think this thru & get it for the important people in our lives.

2007-01-01 03:08:16 · answer #10 · answered by LCee 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers