With the popularity of Obama and Clinton both at this point seem to be heading into the election against each other. If one of them wins the Democratic Ticket and chooses the other for the Vice President. Will you vote for them? I think this is the STRONGEST TICKET and BEST CHOICE for America in 2008. Your view/views?
2007-01-01 02:42:57 · 22 answers · asked by AMALA 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Hillary the Eight I Am. Haunting songs of the past.
My view or impression I have of Mrs. Clinton is that she is a Socialist Democrat. I am a Capitalist Democrat. Obama has not been exposed to the media that transmits our association of the persona of the man. He wants the job; but would I vote for either one...No.
As the song rings out , the code is read. I do know the out come.
2007-01-01 03:04:30 · answer #1 · answered by blueridgemotors 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I definitely lean toward liberal. However, I can't say I would be too ecstatic about Clinton being the candidate for the Democratic ticket. Her husband was the best president in recent times, but Hillary I find to be too polarizing and integrated into the political machinery. If it came down it to with her against the current likely GOP candidates, I would probably pick her reluctantly. I supported McCain in his 2000 bid, but he's no longer that candidate.
One ticket I would strongly endorse is Wesley Clark as president with Obama or Edwards as VP.
2007-01-01 02:55:31 · answer #2 · answered by Joe D 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Your argument or suggestion is a logical one, but there is one main fallacy. Political candidates these days are power hungry greedy folks who don't like to share power.... its all or none. Clinton or Obama will not "share" their presidency with anyone who might be a threat to their power. So I don't see it ever happening.... regardless of how much sense it makes.
And no.... I wouldn't vote for them. Mostly because Clinton believes that government is the answer to all our problems.... which will mean more taxes, there is no way around it. Her struggle for "universal health care" in the 90's will surface again and that program will be the biggest boondoggle since welfare and social security was started. It is one of those programs that sounds so good and wonderful on paper, but in reality will be a disaster. Again, the program assumes that people are logical... which they are not. The countries in Europe that started "universal health care" are having to re-think their programs, but you will hear little about that in the media. You have to get it from the people who live there.
2007-01-01 02:58:33 · answer #3 · answered by tmarschall 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
you're making a sturdy factor. while Obama first concept approximately working, yet another senior Senator advised him, " it sluggish is now,guy. Washington is crammed with politicians who waited for the nicely suited time, and it never got here. Do your difficulty now, or you will continuously say " What if?" think of roughly your guy or woman existence. do not you have those self same recommendations on occasion.? that's his time and he knows it... same with Hillary. She has had her eye in this on the grounds that 1992.
2016-10-19 07:44:56 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary Clinton has a SEVERE electability problem that even the Democratic pundits recognize. She has a chance of getting the Veep slot, but she won't get the top nod.
I wouldn't vote for Hillary for the position of bathroom monitor, let alone for any type of national office. She's so far off the extreme liberal scale that I would never vote for her.
Additionally, Hillary's involvement in the following scandals says "NO" to me:
Whitewater, her acceptance of funds from Vivian Verble, her statements in favor of torture in some instances, her involvement in the death of Jim McDougal, the Castle Grande land deal, her false statements in the White House travel scandal, her ties to David Rosen and a bizarre fundraising scandal, her ties to Johnny Chung, John Huang and Jorge Cabrera...
I dunno, the list of reasons goes on and on.
2007-01-01 03:01:40 · answer #5 · answered by mom2trinityj 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Obama is nobody, at this point (even though he is probably very popular in his own district). But he is young, he holds a high office, and with some efforts he could possibly become a good VP candidate, say, in 10-20 years, if he were NOT a Muslim. It is my strong opinion that Muslims are not electable in America.
As for Clinton, she will never make it to the WH even as a VP. She is simply not electable no matter how hard she will try (just read the posts above).
2007-01-01 03:34:24 · answer #6 · answered by rp121121 3 · 1⤊ 5⤋
I may vote for Obama, have to read up on him more. But definitely wouldn't vote for Clinton at all.
2007-01-01 03:43:19 · answer #7 · answered by FaerieWhings 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
due to obama's christian beliefs i doubt he would choose Hilary. no matter what i would vote for obama, NO MATTER who else even runs. I'm a white female and i cant stand Hilary. i like what i see and here from obama. nice question, but realistically i doubt obama would even ask Hilary, now Hilary may ask obama, but probably only because of his popularity.
2007-01-04 17:57:23 · answer #8 · answered by angelchele 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Mrs. Clinton in 2008
Mr. Obama in 2016
2007-01-01 02:57:36 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
I wouldn't vote for either of them, no matter what order you put them in. One has no experience and is desperately swinging to the left and the other is a chamelion flip-flopper who changes directions like a windsock in a breeze.
2007-01-01 02:59:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋