OK so saddam has been executed,was it right or wrong.
In my view, IM NO JUDGE TO DECIDE A MANS LIFE......Im no fan of the man,Im just trying to justify this new Iraqi government.
He showed no fare before being executed,and will be shown as a Marta...The thing that really sickened me was the fact the British and Americans are there to supposedly bring peace.
saddam was hanged by the Iraq government,along with them chanting, Go to hell,SCUM,and other sadistic comments.
This is supposed to be the new Iraq,Surely you have to agree whatever the man has done he is hanged with at least some kind of dignity,And if this is the new Iraq without saddam then what's changed,still the same to me.
The very fact how he was hanged,will not change nothing,only anger his followers causing even more devastation.
2006-12-31 23:06:53 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
I don't approve to this. No man in this world have the right to decide a human's life span. Saddam requires punishment for his cruelty but Bush he have no right to kill him as he have killed thrible than what Saddam has killed. Not only that , he has been executed on the eve of Eid. That's not at all fair. Bush will surely have to pay for these cruel deeds.
2006-12-31 23:21:15 · answer #1 · answered by Cool girl 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Men make the judgement as to who lives or dies. My main problem is that some of these men enjoy this duty a bit too much, perhaps even looking for the chance to sit in judgement of others. Imagine the feeling of power, knowing you have control over whether one lives or dies. The power could be addictive. Personally, I know, that every once in a while, I am wrong or at least mistaken.
2007-01-01 12:32:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The man was tried and i believe that this was correct. The execution is troubling in my mind but different countries have different rules.
It was extremely wrong to show the pictures leading upto and including his death. Every man has he right to die in dignity and this should not be taken from any man. If you feel the need to execute someone, don't show it in public.
MY KIDS DO NOT NEED TO SEE THAT.
2007-01-01 07:18:50 · answer #3 · answered by lolajanethompson 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i was just about to ask this question. in my own opinion, he shouldn't have been killed. he should have been imprisoned for life. it is true that he was heartless with fellow men but his execution doesn't encourage or advance the peace process.
just look, after his execution, about 60 people were killed in car bomb explosions among the shiites.
the british and the americans that claim to keep peace are the ones fueling the carnage and violence in iraq indirectly.
when all these will end is still to be known!
2007-01-01 07:19:13 · answer #4 · answered by number 1 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
A trial is more than he gave the people he executed and tortured. I'm thinking there wasn't alot of dignity attached to their deaths either.
2007-01-01 09:12:46 · answer #5 · answered by Firespider 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was a cruel evil man and got what he deserved. He was treated more fairly than most of his victims. Good riddence.
2007-01-01 09:14:02 · answer #6 · answered by Paul K 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe you should ask all those Shiite's he killed! Who will think of him as a martyr? And really, how much dignity did he show his victims? His countrymen killed him, what does that have to do with Britain and America? What exactly are you thinking with?
2007-01-01 07:21:12 · answer #7 · answered by chuchthomas 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Marta Smarta the man is dead and good riddance.
2007-01-01 07:17:24 · answer #8 · answered by evildragon1952 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeaps. Nothing is bettered by his death.
The British and Americans will "bring peace" only if there are benefits for them to reap.
2007-01-01 08:14:06 · answer #9 · answered by Chocolate Strawberries. 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
What's a Marta?? If you have a Marta do you also have a Farta??
2007-01-01 12:19:52 · answer #10 · answered by DRAGON'S RETURN 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋