English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

Apart from the infinite mass case, here is another possibility:
a quantum particle whose position is known with some certainty. This means its velocity always has some uncertainty, so you can never say 'it has been stopped', so its unstoppable.

..i don't know if zero mass qualifies as an answer, as such a light particle may have to be treated quantum mechanically, so one cannot draw inferences using F = ma.

2006-12-31 22:24:04 · answer #1 · answered by Venkat 3 · 0 0

Clearly this is a false statement.

There are a couple of scenarios which contradict this statement.

As a previous respondent has said, infinite mass would render the object unstoppable.

The other scenario is a point "mass" of mass zero kilograms. No force can be applied to it at all, so therefore it is unstoppable....qed

2007-01-01 06:14:34 · answer #2 · answered by Mez 6 · 1 0

False.

Acceleration is a change in velocity and would only be required to STOP the object (were it moving in the first place). Since this object is "unstoppable," though, no acceleration would be large enough to stop it, even an infinite one.

2007-01-01 06:12:18 · answer #3 · answered by Regala 1 · 0 0

There is no such thing as 'unstoppable'
Some theoretical extremes are interesting
1. If 'a' tends to infinity (just assumption, not practically possible), 'f' tends to infinity (assumed 'unstoppable')
2. If 'm' tends to infinity, 'f' tends to infinity
m tends to infinity only when velocity of mass = velocity of light which is not achievable [theory of relativity]
3. Newton's first law of intertia
If the velocity of mass is infinity (not possible as mass velocity cannot be more than that of light], the mass inertia is infinity and it is not achievable.

2007-01-01 09:05:38 · answer #4 · answered by Sheen 4 · 1 0

I think F = dp/dt is more of an appropriate form of newton's second law to answer your question. Nevertheless it is nonsense, as such an object would violate conservation of momentum. Also in the object's reference frame, if its speed is lower than the speed of light, the object has zero velocity.

2007-01-01 08:40:44 · answer #5 · answered by Tony O 2 · 0 0

Hello =)

False...it could also have infinite mass....there is no such thing as any of the three, however.....

Namaste, and Happy New Year,

--Tom

2007-01-01 05:51:58 · answer #6 · answered by glassnegman 5 · 1 0

As long as its acceleration will never approach zero.

2007-01-01 08:27:03 · answer #7 · answered by Ojo 2 · 0 0

Of course TRUE. If it can't be stopped, it must be moving.

2007-01-01 05:50:38 · answer #8 · answered by JP8 2 · 0 0

In theory yes.

In practicle not yet done

2007-01-01 12:31:48 · answer #9 · answered by Suhas 2 · 0 0

only in space.

2007-01-01 05:55:40 · answer #10 · answered by trysssa999 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers