Size 10 and larger Brazilian bikini/bikini bottoms are henceforth BANNED.
This BAN insures that men scrutinising ladies' bottoms are not overcome with nausea, severe vomiting, dry-retching, motion-illness, extreme newfound-homosexuality, optic-celluliteosis (eye condition caused by excess dimpled wobbly skin movements) &permanent blindness.
There shall be a new legal limit on female bottom widths and depth of the cheek-crease- anything exceeding the average man's hand width and depth is strictly prohibited and punishable by several hours of public spanking.
This New Law is in place to eliminate false reportage of stranded marine mammals and wanton displays of detachment from reality.
This new law is punishable by charge of the criminal Offense of Public Visual ASSault and Grievous Bodily Misattire.
Thankfully, beaches shall now be free from women from assaulting us with their enormous behinds. The US & most of Europe shall soon follow, but equine-arsses remain endemic to the US.
2006-12-31 20:59:30 · 10 answers · asked by Ministry of Camp Revivalism 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
Do you know how big a women's size 10 undies are??? I wear a 6, and I think that's even way too big. Revise it to say size 6 and larger are banned.
2006-12-31 21:06:05 · answer #1 · answered by littlechrismary 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Heyyyy, i gather you do not like volupteous woman then. All for the Posh look . So skeletors are what you are into. Huh, i am sure the rocks at Brighton will scar their bottoms for life. Bad luck you will never know what a real woman feels like then. Good luck with the scars left behind by size o hip-bones:(
2006-12-31 22:53:46 · answer #2 · answered by Duisend-poot 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes,go along with that including the male lot some of our most beautiful coastline suffers when yer view is blocked by what appears to be a dark cloud only to find out it isn`t.!
2006-12-31 22:40:47 · answer #3 · answered by edison 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
God can not be considered through the human eye. yet His eternal ability and divine personality are standard and obviously considered through the flaws He has made. the actual undeniable truth that God can not be considered does not propose He can not be standard. yet, in case you've been to seem on the order of issues as being held consistent through the author, who created all issues, you may commence to work out the God, who became and is functional adequate to create one of those eye-catching position although He can not be considered immediately. Now faith is the peace of mind of issues became hoping for, the conviction of issues not considered. For through it the adult men of previous received approval. through religion you keep in mind that the international with each and every eye-catching advent became prepared through the note of God, so as that what's considered became not created from issues that are seen...!
2016-10-16 22:49:24 · answer #4 · answered by venturino 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fine, so long as it applies equally to both sexes. Why should women have to put up with the sight of fat, flabby male arses?
2006-12-31 21:22:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'll vote for it but only if men stop flaunting their saggy stomachs and behinds and G strings are a definite no no for men.
2006-12-31 22:26:18 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
ROTFLMAO! Mate, this ought to be in the humour section as well.
I call it "indecent flabbing and flobbing."
You have made my New Year's morning and afternoon! Thank you. Let's send it to anyone we know in the United States.
--That Cheeky Lad
2006-12-31 21:08:44 · answer #7 · answered by Charles-CeeJay_UK_ USA/CheekyLad 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Mmm, that's one way of getting something off the ground, I s'pose... Well done for trying, Happy New Year! ;-)
2006-12-31 21:03:30 · answer #8 · answered by Nini 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm sorry but that didnt even raise a smile with me.
2006-12-31 21:05:53 · answer #9 · answered by Caroline 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think you are a ****.
2007-01-01 13:06:16 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋