English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Or would you not have kids at all because you were unable to later? I would have my kids at a young age to have them, all 3 of them.

2006-12-31 18:22:44 · 13 answers · asked by *~*~*~* 4 in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

13 answers

When I was 19 I had a miscarriage and the doc told me I could never have kids. I went 6 years wishing that I could of had a chance to have at least one, then it happened last year I got pregnant, I was happy and scared of another miscarriage. After I had my daughter the doc told me if I wanted any more I needed to have them with in the next 3 years or I probably couldn't. I had a really hard pregnancy and had to be induced 6 weeks early. I want more kids but when I got pregnant I kept saying that I didn't want to have another til this one was 5 or so. But since I know what I know now I'm going to try to have another next year. So, yes I would rather have kids when I was young than to not have them at all. Because being a mother is really great!!

2006-12-31 18:31:21 · answer #1 · answered by shannon h 4 · 2 0

No, because the mid to late teen years is a time for growing up and making mistakes, not being a parent. I would just adopt my kids later in life with someone I love and are married too. A child is a child no matter if they are biological or adopted.

2006-12-31 18:27:25 · answer #2 · answered by ♥♥Bree♥♥ 7 · 0 0

Yes, I would. I love kids and want to have six myself. Have children, at all costs. Just make sure you have the time and money to support them.

However, if you don't want to now, as others have said, you could adopt later, if you'd like. It's just opening your heart and home to other children, and they could be like your children, even if they didn't come from your womb.

2006-12-31 18:30:29 · answer #3 · answered by Keyne 4 · 1 0

One would think it is more important to have children with the person you truly love and would also make a great parent for those children. Adoption is always an option if you cannot bear children later.

2006-12-31 18:26:58 · answer #4 · answered by ©2009 7 · 0 0

I, myself, would not have been ready. I would adopt children when I was. I may have to do this anyway because of health concerns, and hey, there's nothing wrong with adoption.

2006-12-31 18:51:15 · answer #5 · answered by cotopaximary 4 · 0 0

yes i would b/c i wan sum1 tha will pass down mi name in th family tree n thy would love me 4 me even if th mom left me i wan 3 kids to 1boy 1girl n maby another boy i don kno

2006-12-31 18:26:17 · answer #6 · answered by forrest b 1 · 0 0

it depends on whether i was with the person i truely loved Having kids just because you can is irresponsible

2006-12-31 18:32:40 · answer #7 · answered by trxr4kdz 5 · 0 0

when i was that young i wanted kids really bad but couldn't and now that i'm alot older i'm so glad cause i don't want any.

2006-12-31 18:25:01 · answer #8 · answered by Neev 7 · 1 0

No! I NEVER want to have kids! And I certainaly wouldn't want to have them during my teen years.Why ruin your life while so young?

2006-12-31 18:25:32 · answer #9 · answered by Fang 4 · 0 1

yes, i would

2006-12-31 18:24:57 · answer #10 · answered by Mag 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers