If you were to be put into a room full of morons how long would it be before you said something about them being morons? By morons I mean like being put in a room full of children but they do not have the ability to learn very well. Would it be your fault or there fault that they are not able to learn as fast as you would like?
2006-12-31 17:17:58 · 16 answers · asked by magpiesmn 6 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
I would immediately accept them at the level they are in,there is no sense to be intolerant to ignorance,its useless to be angry at someone who has no knowledge of what they do.Instead I would try to value what they do know,and enlighten them with what I do,no matter how ignorant,disabled or uneducated a person may be,they have something of quality within them if you just take the time.In fact it is fascinating to get an ignorant perspective on the world.
2006-12-31 17:20:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I would ask to be transferred before I made the comment of "morons". If you are asked for an explanation you just tell them that you have a drastic problem there with the attention span of the others and it is disruptive for your learning process. That always will get a better response than the word morons. It is hard I know been there and done that. Happy New Year
2006-12-31 17:32:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
If they had learning difficulties I wouldn't call them morons, it wouldn't be their fault the way they were born.
Actually, I wouldn't even think of them as being morons. I've met some morons in my time, but my idea of a moron isn't a child with learning difficulties. My nephew has autism and he's not a moron unlike a lot of supposedly 'normal' people.
If you're a teacher of kids with learning difficulties I sincerely hope you don't always refer to them as 'morons'
(sorry if i misunderstood your question by the way)
EDIT - Another thumbs down. I wonder what the 'right' answer to this question was.
2006-12-31 17:33:57 · answer #3 · answered by . 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Ignorance does not always equate with moronic.. example.. your doctor doesn't know what your symptoms mean.. so you are referred to another physician.. your doc is ignorant of many things.. but usually can't be called a moron.. lol
2007-01-01 16:48:07 · answer #4 · answered by Century25 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If they can not help being "morons", I would be able to deal with it for as long as I needed to. In your example of children, I mean come on, if they can't help being slow they can't help it. On the other hand, if it is a bunch of stupid adults who are just stupid because they are, it would take me about 2 seconds flat before I started telling them exactly what I thought.
2006-12-31 17:27:34 · answer #5 · answered by averyanne77 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
About as long as I can tolerate a sentence ending with a preposition. I find it equally difficult to tolerate a sentence that should contain commas...Check the grammar and spelling before ranting. It'll make you SEEM articulate.
2007-01-01 15:02:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
nicely lack of expertise .. if somebody makes errors out of igorance it somewhat is they do it as a results of fact they don't comprehend from now on helpful conceitedness it somewhat is a different rely.. in the event that they think of they comprehend extra helpful and have faith they stand above you.. it somewhat is something i would not tolerate in any respect.. yet with somebody who's basically asserting something irrelevant and is somewhat unaware and blind to it.. which potential they don't comprehend what they say or do is seen impolite . i could supply them to teach them the ropes....and in the event that they're keen to settle for and alter their tactics and learn from this then i've got faith that it became extremely basically their loss of understanding what became predicted of them.. as a results of fact in line with risk they have different tactics or a different subculture.. yet conceitedness and thinking they're extra helpful and comprehend all and then coach they comprehend not something it somewhat is worse.. lack of expertise i will excuse as a results of fact to be ignorant.. potential they don't comprehend the differenct between what's ideal and what isn't... they'd desire to settle for a huge gamble to income i've got faith.. somebody to take them below their wing... and in the event that they coach progression then i've got faith they deserve this 2d risk.. they are not offensive on purpose.. ignorant human beings do not comprehend.. smug human beings think of they comprehend each and every thing and have faith they're extra ideal.. such behaviour i would not tolerate yet lack of expertise i could settle for as long as they're keen to income the right way of doing issues and what to assert ... and supply them a pair of weeks and in the event that they make progression then they'd desire to settle for a 2d risk.. yet not smug human beings x
2016-10-19 07:33:08 · answer #7 · answered by wishon 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ignorant people can be taught. Slowly, maybe, but I can be pretty damn slow too depending on the course. I can get aggravated with them, but I can tolerate them for a LONG time.
STUPID people... well, they can't be taught at all so I can only tolerate then for about as long as it takes me to scream obscenities at them.
2006-12-31 19:29:35 · answer #8 · answered by Voodoid 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
By your use of english I would say that you would be the biggest moron in the room.
2006-12-31 17:29:03 · answer #9 · answered by mogli 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Well, I put up with you for about nine seconds, so that would seem to be the answer. And it's "their fault," not "there fault." Moron.
2006-12-31 17:22:33 · answer #10 · answered by Scott F 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋