English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

15 answers

I would be also, because teams that have opportunistic defenses and special teams, and quarterbacks playing as inconsistent as Rex Grossman, end up having these hiccups. Riding on the coat tails of your defense/special teams for more than half the year could end up costing them another super bowl win. Hopefully they had the hiccup early on where it won't cost them anything in the postseason, but then again, maybe they just weren't taking the game too seriously since it really meant nothing to either team. But if that was true, why were all of the defensive starters playing then??? Only time will tell, hope your team does well.

2006-12-31 15:53:32 · answer #1 · answered by chrisbriggs3 2 · 1 1

I bleed Orange and Blue. But I'm not buying my Super Bowl t-shirt just yet. The Bears found a way to win, in spite of themselves.
I am still miffed why Lovey is so hot on Rex.
Kyle Orton leads the Bears to 10 wins as a rookie, then becomes invisible this year.
I figure that they will play the Seahawks (sorry Dallas) - and if they get past that game - they may have a chance against the Eagles.

2006-12-31 17:23:23 · answer #2 · answered by ump2please 4 · 0 0

The Cubs between the appropriate communities in baseball good now. in no way lost better than 2 in a row at abode all 365 days. They lose 5 right now and all of the Cub followers are pushing the panic button. this is the appropriate to work out. they could would desire to lose 0.5 of the video games that are left to not make the playoffs, yet each and every of the Cub followers shop pushing that panic button. flow White Sox.

2016-12-11 20:15:18 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I don't see the Bears in the superbowl. They Lost to the Pack and just Barely beat some of the worst teams in the NFL, like the Cardinals, Lions, the Bucs and the Vikings.

2006-12-31 22:31:03 · answer #4 · answered by dudeman612 6 · 0 0

I about to but I think that this game was an example of what NOT to do at the game in 2 weeks. Know that the lose is out of there system they can focus on winning.

2006-12-31 15:54:25 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 2

not panicking yet, but it sure would be nice to get a few guys healthy eh? i know Tommy wont be back, but at least lets get Tillman going again, and I hate to say it, but it's time to replace Mike Brown... how many years in a row is it now he hasnt stayed healthy?

2006-12-31 18:11:53 · answer #6 · answered by matt s 1 · 0 0

ok people, calm down a little, you can't tell me you watched that game and thought the bears tried. seriously i watched the entire game and it was like they handed it to the packers. come on, it's called respect, the bears are already in the playoffs and have a bye, and the packers weren't getting in, why would the bears risk hurting anyone when they have a superbowl to worry about (well, and the playoffs first) plus anyone watching knows that it was favres last game, and sometimes you gotta send someone out right, favre was one of the greats, and he deserved to go out on a high note. don't worry bears fans, it was what it was, but it wasn't what they are.

2006-12-31 15:59:30 · answer #7 · answered by kristen 4 · 1 4

offense is horrible for the bears, but i still believe there defense will come through for them. if they play philly then they will lose. it will be the saints in the super bowl.

2006-12-31 15:58:28 · answer #8 · answered by Shutout Steve 1 · 1 1

i see Chicago in the Super Bowl. I honestly do. and they will win, if they don't play the Colts.

2006-12-31 21:58:04 · answer #9 · answered by Jeremy Medlock 5 · 0 0

rex grossman...2/12, 33 yds, 0 TD, 3 INT......0 rating...
brian griese a little better...but 2 INT...
i thought they were gonna put in kyle orton next....

2006-12-31 16:04:30 · answer #10 · answered by immisterkevin 4 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers