English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

But yet they don't seem to recognize that Bush was a draft dodger. Better still, they diss Kerry (and no I don't like Kerry) for actually going to war.

2006-12-31 12:54:50 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

I am still waiting for an answer. Nobody has given me a good one yet...And no, Bush may have enlisted, but he never showed up.

2006-12-31 12:59:51 · update #1

17 answers

Considering the hypocrisy of backing Iraq's regime through so many administrations. I understand your question.
Bush Sr.'s administration led Saddam to believe that we wouldn't have a problem with Iraq's military plans against Kuwait.
It wasn't until the Saudi's asked for America to intervene that we went into Kuwait. Saudi Arabian money and the connections to the Bush family businesses. Hello!!!!
War is profitable. Alliances that will be formed in the future of that area of the world in regard to the US. Haliburton--OPEC.
All financially benefit the administration we currently have.
The foot work of war is done by the financially underprivileged.
How many standing government officials have children who will be the soldiers in harms way?? Not too many.
Conservatives usually hold all the power and control the money and utilize the military as an ends to a means.

In regard to Kerry. When he came back to America and started telling Americans about some of the attrocities that were going on in Vietnam he was portrayed as a traitor because some people feel that as a soldier he should have kept them within the military instead of bringing it to the awareness of the Americans.
If Americans are kept in the dark and fed propaganda by the government officials in charge they "stay the course". Once Kerry shed light on things that some of our soldiers were doing the government and the military were being asked to answer to it.

2006-12-31 13:32:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

Bush didn't dodge the draft. Please become more educated before you ask an unbalanced, biased question, again. George Bush Jr. enlisted into the National Guard, who protects the sea border's of the United States of America. The National Guard is a part of the military, same as Marines, Army, Navy, and Air force. He did his job, as was directed he do.
John Kerry, told lies about his fellow soldier's, and to congress to boot. He recently called enlisted soldier's STUPID, and that most of them didn't graduate from high school. That is false. Again, John Kerry, democrat, lied, or is just plain uneducated. The majority of enlisted military, have some kind of college degree.
You can stand by lies all you want to, and play at happiness, but when truth come to smack you right in the face, you're going to be very confused, and say to yourself, "how could I have been so wrong??????" But it will be too late. No one will have mercy for you, then.

He did show up. If he hadn't he would have been charged with AWOL. He never was. Please, again, learn the facts.

2006-12-31 13:09:51 · answer #2 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 5 1

President Bush was not a Draft Dodger. He was given a
HONORABLE DISCHARGE from the Texas Air National
Guard. Hanoi John Kerry is a liar and traitor. His Discharge from the Naval Reserves is in question.
Conservatives are " pro-war" because we believe in a very strong defense of the USA and if that was not so, we would of had more terrorist attacks in this country.
Have a Very Happy New Year!!!!!

2006-12-31 13:10:59 · answer #3 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 4 1

Let me ask you this, Why are liberals so anti-war? Maybe because they follow the Kerry Fairy and they too are better suited for turning tail and hiding. Formerly termed yellow-bellied.

Conservatives have what is called courage for country (that’s why the majority of enlisted military are conservative) and that is why they are so "pro-war" as you call it. Why are liberals so pro useless holidays and pro useless government programs?

Kerry is criticized for going to war and then coming back and throwing away his medals (and this is the man who wants to be president, who has no pride in country) President Bush as he should be addressed instead of just "Bush" is criticized for being a Republican.

2006-12-31 13:08:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5 2

lower than no circumstances. you imagine human beings elect to be attacked? Do they elect to be in positions the position protection is critical? you turn the different cheek about the global and also you're searching at tyranny. What if we grew to change into the different cheek even as Germany change into bombing Europe? you turn the different cheek with the human beings on your existence who lie on you or do something unethical, yet not unlawful. there is righteous anger obviously contained in the bible, Christ himself grew very indignant contained in the temple. this is organic and a accepted reaction. this is the way you're taking care of that anger that comes to a decision your personality. how can you be so trusting of others as to have self assurance human beings elsewhere do not desire conflict or warfare? they are going to commence it and invent causes, in the journey that they ought to, to justify their habit. verify out 9-11. I recommend that change into an attack up there with Pearl Harbor, made worse by really centred on defenseless civilians. Christ did not marketing campaign for the rights of criminals or warmongers. even as all of us might want to be forgiven, all of us ought to face the consequences of their moves. you're taking duty for your moves and obey the guidelines of the land. once you're the chief of a usa, and also you're attacked, it is your duty to verify it would not take position lower back. in case you poorly take care of your usa and it expenses the lives of others on your usa, it truly is blood on your fingers merely as a lot as those attacking.

2016-12-01 09:23:00 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

What? I'm not pro-war, President Bush was not a draft-dodger, he did actually serve, and Kerry...well, Kerry would still not be worthy of even shining my father's (RIP) boots.
Nobody is pro-war. It's just that some people think it's sometimes a necessary evil.

2006-12-31 12:57:25 · answer #6 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 7 5

I'd answer the question, if I understood it. It looks like 3 or 4 to me.

Your premise is faulty that "conservatives are pro war." Just because we do not wish the war to be fought here, with us reduced to protecting ourselves from terrorist onslaught, does not make us pro-war.

2006-12-31 13:03:56 · answer #7 · answered by ? 7 · 5 1

How would you deal with terrorist?? Give them everything they want and not go to war after they killed thousands of Americans?? Bush wasn't a draft dodger, did you investigate yourself, I doubt it, so shut up!!
Oh and rare2find, I would be proud and wouldn't stop my two sons from going to war.

2006-12-31 13:04:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5 2

I'm not pro-war per se, but I don't appreciate getting punched in the mouth, so I don't mind fighting back.

2006-12-31 13:11:56 · answer #9 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 4 1

Well if we didn't go to war, then the terrorists would be running the show in the Mid-East. Is it a coincidence that since we went to war, there has been no other terror attacks on the USA?

2006-12-31 12:58:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5 3

fedest.com, questions and answers