If we start......counting... who killed more? well, The good news is that Sadam is dead so no more killings from him but Bush is still alive.....
2006-12-31 12:54:40 · 15 answers · asked by Lina 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
hmm Bush is crazy I don't kno what he has been thinking all of these years but it's time for him to go. I could say all the stuff I wanted to say about him but you would be reading forever
2006-12-31 12:57:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Honestly, folks! The real question is: Are Americans generally out to do good in this world, or commit evil? If you believe the latter than we are no better than any Saddam, Stalin or Hitler, and as a society we have no purpose to exist. But if you--as most Americans do, believe the former, then what we are doing in Iraq is honorable. Yes, the fact that we have lost 3000 of our best Americans, is a tragedy. It is also tragic that men such as Mr. Bush must commit these people to war. But what intellectually honest citizen can argue that the world would be much better without Bush vs. Hussein?
2006-12-31 13:11:59 · answer #2 · answered by steens2 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Lets see,um, Bush is trying to free a country while keeping ours safe. Sadam killed at will, even his own family members. You do the math! Also I am guessing you are about 15 years old. right?
2006-12-31 13:05:14 · answer #3 · answered by michael f 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋
You figure it out........
In the United States you can say what ever your little heart desires about the President and smile happy.
In Iraq during Saddam , you spoke against him - not only would you die. Saddam would have killed your entire family if not your entire neighborhood.
So my thinking would be Saddam but then again I'm just a dumb veteran....Happy New Year in the Land of the Free..
2006-12-31 13:06:03 · answer #4 · answered by Akkita 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Lets get it right from the get go ... Bush hasn't killed anyone. Yes he did order the military into Iraq but he hasn't pulled the trigger, blown up, hung, cut the head off, gassed anyone...
Someone stated 9/11 ... I seem to rember somewhere that it wasn't the U.S. that attacked NYC, I don't thing the big W in dc ever told anyone to get on them planes and crash into any buildings........ As for our brave soilders in Iraq..... Let me get this straight ... 3,000 of our boys in green, tan, blue, and white have died there ... and how many years have we been there?
Will someone PLEASE go back to the Veitnam war ... How about Korea ... WW2 .... ww1 ... our own bloody civil war... Look at the number of deaths in ANY of these conflicts and your freaking out because of 3,000 soilders who have died doing something that they beleive in... and then you stand here in the U.S. of A. and blam the president for it ... Do I back everything Bush does? No! but this is something that as our President he felt for the good of the nation that we had to do.. so I will suport him till he feels that we can bring our boys home... even if it means I'm one of the ones that goes over there and gives my life.
2006-12-31 13:24:57 · answer #5 · answered by R.Elsedragon 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Drop the comic e book and commence examining cutting-edge activities, boy ! Why is it, once you dweebs attain puberty, you imagine you may run with the massive adult men, intellectually ? Saddams own human beings, it truly is, the Shiite ruled authorities of Iraq did the deed, and it change into competely out of the fingers of the U. S. protection stress. easily, this is style of fresh to ascertain a punishment performed, once the perp is convicted. I many times ask your self how a lot extra effective capitol punishment might want to be, contained in the U. S., in the journey that they performed executions interior of ninety days,following convictions. extremely in cases the position DNA helped contained in the conviction !
2016-12-01 09:22:57 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Im with protocal on this one. Just look at 9/11 and see who was really behind that then decide who was worse.
At least sadam kept the two different sects of muslims from killing one another (by force of course, but still).
2006-12-31 13:03:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Bush is not ordering Iraqis to kill each other. Its secretarian violence. Shiits killing Sunnis, Sunnis killing Shiites. He didn't tell insurgence to set IED for US soldiers. Do you sue police everytime they fail to prevent murder? Do you sue fire department everytime someone dies in fire they didn't cause? Tell us what order Bush gave that said 'kill Iraqis and US soldiers' or people will use this kind of comments to make fun of liberals.
2006-12-31 13:07:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Bush is far worse since he killed 3,000 Americans on 9/11 and untold hundreds of thousands in Iraq and Afghanistan. Bush is approaching the atrocities of both Hitler and Stalin.
2006-12-31 12:58:48 · answer #9 · answered by protocols 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Saddam, he was in bad need of a personal groomer.
2006-12-31 12:58:15 · answer #10 · answered by foreverquilting2003 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋