UCLA and oregon state losses and a future loss to michigan
2006-12-31 11:14:59 · 12 answers · asked by simkvn64 2 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
haha mich.by 50/
2006-12-31 11:23:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's not pathetic to lose to UCLA and Oregon State compared to how Michigan lost 5 games last year and nearly lost to Ball St this year. Contrary to popular belief, Michigan has no business even being in the debate for #2. If you aren't even champion of your conference, you can't be National Champions.
Besides, the player deserving of NFL Rookie of the Year (Maurice Jones-Drew) came out of UCLA. USC is a team that is in a transition year.
Michigan isn't going to go into Los Angeles and beat USC. At a neutral site, it would be a push, but at the Rose Bowl, USC should be favored by about 7. I'm predicting a 3 point win for USC because of home field advantage.
2006-12-31 19:28:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
USC is far from pathetic, they just can't compete with teams like Michigan and Ohio State this year, having lost several NFL quality offensive players.
Anybody can lose to a soft team; the Buckeyes were one play and a final-seconds tackle away from losing to Indiana.
However, Michigan and Ohio State have offense and defense, USC just has defense (relatively, of course, as USC's offense is not terrible).
2006-12-31 19:22:38 · answer #3 · answered by Roy 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't like USC at all, but they are FAR from pathetic, dude.
They went 10-2 with possibly THE toughest schedule in the country and I pick them to beat Michigan by 17
2006-12-31 23:55:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
USC is going to show what other teams have shown. That Big Ten teams are weak. Florida and Arkansas are going to prove it also.
2006-12-31 19:36:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tell me, since you know USC is going to lose tomorrow, whats the final score going to be? I would love to call Vegas.
2006-12-31 19:23:21 · answer #6 · answered by Third Uncle 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
actually, that makes them better. they have the ability to beat the really good teams, but they lose to the weaker teams. i blame carroll for those losses, he sais he would prepare, but he didnt. but USC always wins when they are underdogs, they will beat the wolverines.
2006-12-31 19:18:40 · answer #7 · answered by johnnytightlips 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
USC could easily beat Michigan (we don't do all that well in bowl games)...
2006-12-31 19:22:33 · answer #8 · answered by mJc 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
shut up man I play linebacker for the Almighty Trojans. THE REFS BLEW THE UCLA GAME. JD did good too
2006-12-31 19:16:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Uh... yeah. USC can suck themselves. They loose to **** teams. They're just too full of themselves.
2006-12-31 19:19:47 · answer #10 · answered by Stu 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋