No WMD
2006-12-31 10:54:36 · 12 answers · asked by taco 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Clearly Bush has caused more death and destruction in Iraq than Saddam ever caused. I find it as ridiculous as you, obviously, that Bush can even look into a mirror. Good thing he's an elitist and has someone else shave him, eh?
2006-12-31 10:57:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 5⤋
Saddam was responsible for the terrorist groups relentless mass killing on a day to day basis as well as ordering the gassing of his own people. Our millitary intelligence should be enough to support this evidence and we should continue to support our fellow troops after all they are fighting to prevent more 911 such incidents caused by terrorist groups and it sure is a blessing that they are not leading the war here in the U.S. now isn't it? If we don't pay attention to what are enemies are doing we will surely suffer the bitter result in a much larger scale, so therefore, to be ignorant of our involvement is detrimental to our freedom as a U.S. citizen.
2006-12-31 11:16:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
SADDAM!! The WMD were moved out of the country
before the US entered Iraq!!!
2006-12-31 10:59:41 · answer #3 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
I'll tell you who's fault it is. it is the American peoples fault. we helped Saddam get into power. we elect are govt officials into office. so it is are fault, the American people. we elect are govt to make are decisions for us when it comes to are country and world, why? because we think what they say sounds sweet and put them in office. maybe we as a country of free thinking people should start reading between the lines of are runner up. and stop buying their bull.
2006-12-31 11:06:40 · answer #4 · answered by loretta 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I wish we killed more then saddam by 20 times then the war would be over. I say kill em all and let god sort em out. your a stupid hippy arn't you. I only care about americans who died. It would be a lot less if we didn't do the humanitarian **** and bomb them into the ground.
2006-12-31 11:00:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
CLEARLY YOU KNOW LITTLE OF IRAG'S HISTORY UNDER SADDAM...HE KILLED OVER 300,000. YOU DO THE NUMBERS, OH DUMB ONE!
2006-12-31 11:26:03 · answer #6 · answered by tcbtoday123 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
if the ****** liberals would stop giving comfort to the enemy we could end this bull and get on with life.
2006-12-31 11:07:19 · answer #7 · answered by 007 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I dont believe bush has killed a single one over there
2006-12-31 10:57:52 · answer #8 · answered by life_member_nra 2 · 4⤊ 4⤋
BUSH is responsible of killing almost 1 million people! period!
Americans cant handle the truth! well , hte right winger morons!
2006-12-31 10:57:55 · answer #9 · answered by David F 2 · 3⤊ 4⤋
so far saddam, but were catching up, hopefully...
2006-12-31 10:57:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋