And why?
2006-12-31 09:35:21 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Socrates would never let the argument end, and Nietzsche would endure.
2006-12-31 09:38:30 · answer #1 · answered by Invisible_Flags 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
its not about wining an argument.. what would that mean??
the existence of a true? what would that be??
I think that the nicer part would be to see both sides and both arguments, realizing that all statement could apply to different circunstances.. omg! am I been to sophistic?
Anyway.. back to the answer, I think Socrates would help Nietzsche in to get more ideas in to the light..
2006-12-31 10:02:20 · answer #2 · answered by luisa 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I should hope Socrates.
2006-12-31 09:39:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm sure my mom would step in, and sort it out!!!!
but really, not having read either particularly i still don't think philosophy is actually about winning arguments, isn't that law?
why?
Well just think, and then realize that not everything in this world is about competition.
2006-12-31 10:15:34 · answer #4 · answered by Ontol 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
socrates would walk away from 'em within the first five minutes, dismissing him for the utter fool he was, and deciding instead to work with one of his apprentices, or DO one of his apprentices.
2006-12-31 09:38:32 · answer #5 · answered by metroactus 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Nietzsche
ANYONE WHO SEES THIS please answer the question in the Books & Authors sections titled: 'Excerpt from "The Lord of the Flies"?' please.
2006-12-31 09:50:14 · answer #6 · answered by i need help 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋