forgetting their true identity and were forced to identify themselves only by the new religion that was injected into their grandmothers wombs by the Roman soldiors?The Gaelecks are the coasions of the Iranians.That is why some idiots think that peoples history starts from some false religion.?
2006-12-31 09:29:08 · 10 answers · asked by T T 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
I can't help myself: you sound a little bit thick yourself...
2006-12-31 22:45:10 · answer #1 · answered by Sterz 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I’ve seen a lot of questions in Yahoo/Answers that are challenged in terms of spelling and others challenged in terms of illogical assertions and others challenged in terms of wrong foundations, but this is interesting in that it is challenged in all three areas. As near as I can guess you are asking the following edited for clearity:
“Did you know that the thick in Ireland were raped by the Romans into forgetting their true identity and were forced to identify themselves only by the new religion that was injected into their grandmothers wombs by the Roman soldiers?”
“The Gaelic are cousins of the Iranians. That is why some idiots think that people’s history starts from some false religion?”
I can’t decipher what you mean by the word written as “thick” so I don’t know who you are trying to identify as the ones being raped. Even so, as others have pointed out, it really doesn’t matter since the Romans never made it to Ireland. The Norse got to at least some coastal regions and generations after the Romans left the England, English made it to Ireland.
The Gaelic are (I’m guessing here) cousins of the Iranians. This is so far off the mark that it is a wonder where you came up with this erroneous statement. There is no connection between Iranians and the Gaelic, even in their distant roots. The Gaelic are descendants of multiple Celtic migrations. They originated from East of the Caucuses and entered Europe with about 18 separate migrations with at least three reaching England. This occurred beginning prior to the pyramids being constructed, that is somewhere around 5,000 BCE.
What any of this has to do with religion is beyond me. Please, get at least some of the facts correct before asking the question and it would help if you used the Yahoo provided spell checker
2006-12-31 13:13:32 · answer #2 · answered by Randy 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Funny Iknow that the Romans never got to Ireland. That's why there are no Roman ruins in Ireland.
2006-12-31 09:33:55 · answer #3 · answered by redgriffin728 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Fool- the Romans never conquered Ireland
2006-12-31 17:37:31 · answer #4 · answered by brainstorm 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That's interesting because the Romans never reached Ireland. They only made it to the edge of Scotland.
And it's spelled Gaelic.
However, what you've just described - quite poorly I might add, reflects much of what the English did to both Scotland and Ireland.
2006-12-31 09:37:30 · answer #5 · answered by anonymous 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Go Miss Mina, I agree 100%. Yet the English were never made to pay for any of those atrocities.
2006-12-31 12:40:08 · answer #6 · answered by It's been awhile 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
the thick in Ir land... sound like a fantasy tale to me...
Please please please, there is spell check if you can find the cursor and enter buttons!
Oh.. Gaelic, cousins,how does one inject a religion into a woman's womb?
2006-12-31 10:10:10 · answer #7 · answered by thankyou "iana" 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
um what? i konw your question amkes no sense at all
2006-12-31 09:58:00 · answer #8 · answered by cav 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I didn't know that and I don't know it now
2006-12-31 09:31:34 · answer #9 · answered by SteveT 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Please refrain from asking questions until you are sober. I realize it's a drinking holiday, but please.....
2006-12-31 09:34:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋