2006-12-31 08:49:48 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
I don't mean at the exact moment, but close enough
2006-12-31 08:55:51 · update #1
where is the irony.
2006-12-31 12:27:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. One had nothing to do with the other.
President Ford was an honorable man who was respected by his colleagues on both sides of the aisle. He reunited the ccountry after the devisive Watergate affair, and was responsible for many of the rules allowing "average" people to invest in retirement funds like 401(k)'s. Among other things.
If you are trying to smear Republicans with this, you ought to walk away now, before you embarrass yourself.
2006-12-31 17:00:42 · answer #2 · answered by chocolahoma 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not particularly. Gerald Ford was 93 and had been really sick for a long time. There's nothing very shocking or coincidental about a 93-year-old ill man dying.
2006-12-31 17:09:08 · answer #3 · answered by Sass B 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ford died on Tuesday and Saddam died on Friday
2007-01-01 01:17:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. It isn't. And Ford died days before Saddam.
2006-12-31 16:54:11 · answer #5 · answered by Mattvayne 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Gotta throw in James Brown, too.
2006-12-31 18:26:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Ford died on Tuesday, and Hussein died Friday, to answer your question.
<3Marie<3
2006-12-31 16:57:23 · answer #7 · answered by ♥hollister 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yaaaah -
What's up with that ??
One stole the thunder from the other.
2006-12-31 17:43:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saddam was not killed. He was Executed.
2006-12-31 17:01:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
no.
2006-12-31 16:58:14 · answer #10 · answered by JBC 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋